Pepsico
Latest Judgments
Total 179 Consumer Court Cases Against Pepsico.
The Managing Director, Pepsico Holdings (I) Ltd., V/S R. Elangeswaran
Court Name: Cuddalore
Appelant Advocate V.Loganathan
Respondant Advocate A.Jeyamani
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
GAUTAMBHAI B. TRIVEDI V/S PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGIS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SAPAN SHAH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2017
M/s PepsiCo India V/S Manish Kumar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Harsh Nagra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :15/02/2017ORDER Sh. Harsh Nagra, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would ...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2017
Sri Akil Husain V/S M/s Pepsico Company
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/2615(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. M/s Pepsico Company a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sri Akil HusainA...........Re...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2003
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Nazis Shamshi V/S Pepsico
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh B B Tripathi
Respondant Advocate Issar Hussain
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2007/2636(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pepsicoa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Nazis ShamshiA...........R...
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Nazis Shamshi V/S Pepsico
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh B B Tripathi
Respondant Advocate Issar Hussain
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2007/2637(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pepsicoa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Nazis ShamshiW...........R...
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Sayed Sikendra Alam V/S Pepsico India Holding Ltd
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/2499(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Pepsico India Holding Ltd a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sayed S...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Sunil Kumar Agrahari V/S M/s Pepsico Holding Ltd
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Singh
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/512(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/s Pepsico Holding Ltd a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sunil Kuma...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Pepsico India Holding V/S Rajendra Prasad Pandey
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Gopal
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/2244(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Rajendra Prasad Pandey Mohalla Brahmnagar Shuklaganj Poni Road Unn...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2017
Sudhir Kumar and others V/S Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manvender Rathee
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1189
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pepsico in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pepsico ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pepsico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.