Pawar
Latest Judgments
Total 2194 Consumer Court Cases Against Pawar.
1)Piojo vichcal Pune 2)manager,Piego Vicoles,Saisattyam,Solapur 3)Manager,Shriram Transport Finance V/S Sudhir Vishnu Pawar
Transport Finance Finance Pawar
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
1Behind District Treasury Office, Near Central Administrative, Building, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/178 1. Sudhir Vishnu Pawarat post Tavashi Tal PandharpurSolapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. 1)Piojo vichcal Pune 2)manager,Piego Vicoles,Saisattyam,Solapur 3...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MR.DEEPAK ATMARAM PAWAR V/S M/S ASHTVINAYAK ASSOCIATES & ORS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S. SAWANT
Respondant Advocate U.P. WARUNJIKAR
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/1003(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/06/2009 in Case No. 245/07 of District Thane)1. M/S ASHTVINAYAK ASSOCIATES & ORS15 MATRUCHAYA BLDG. ZUNJARRAO NAGAR NEW SHIVAJI PATH KALYAN(...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GOPINATH PATIL PARSIK JANTA SAH BANK LTD V/S SHIVNARAYAN PANDURANG PAWAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MS DEEPTI MISTRI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/11/481. SHIVNARAYAN PANDURANG PAWARR/AT 2/5 OM KANCHANGANGA KHARIGAON KALWA THANE THANEMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GOPINATH PATIL PARSIK JANTA SAH BANK LTD ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Abhudaya Co Op Bank Ltd V/S Mrs. Sheela Dagadu Pawar
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate V.N. Kant, Anand Palande
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/11/61. Mrs. Sheela Dagadu Pawar3 Ismail hal, Behind Manohar Hair utting Salun, Jangal Mangal Road, Sarvoday Nagar, Bhandup (W), Mumbai 400078...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Abhudaya Co Op Bank LtdK.K Tower, Abhudaya Bank Lane, G.D.Ambekar Marg, Parel ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shri. Suresh Malu Kamble V/S Shri. Balu Pandurang Pawar
Court Name: Ratnagiri
Appelant Advocate M. S. Ambre
Respondant Advocate -
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM RATNAGIRIDCF, Collectorate Campus, RatnagiriExecution Application No. EA/10/32 1. Shri. Balu Pandurang Pawar Kuwe,Tal. Lanja. RatnagiriMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Shri. Suresh Malu Kamble Kuwe,Tal. Lanja. RatnagiriMaharashtra ...........Re...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Executive Engg Maharashtra State Electricity Vitaran Co Ltd V/S Shri Shankar Bhiva Pawar
Court Name: Ratnagiri
Appelant Advocate Adv Rajesh Ambavade
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM RATNAGIRIDCF, Collectorate Campus, RatnagiriIA/11/1 1. Shri Shankar Bhiva PawarA/P Gav Nate, Tal. Rajapur, Dist. RatngiriRatnagiriMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Executive Engg Maharashtra State Electricity Vitaran Co LtdDivisional Office Nach...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
नरेंद्र वस्त्र भंडार बेतूल V/S GEETA BAI PAWAR
Court Name: Betul
Appelant Advocate RAJESH SARATHKAR
Respondant Advocate SANJAY KURWADE
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2022
BRANCH MANAGER I.C.I.C.I LOMBARD GENRAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. BHOPAL V/S KAILASH PAWAR
Court Name: Betul
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2022
SHRI VASANTRAO MADHAVRAO PAWAR V/S M/S PARAKH MOTERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S R TAMBAT
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/151(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/01/2011 in Case No. 152/2010 of District Nashik)1. M/S PARAKH MOTERS R/O ARIHANT NAGAR KALWAN ROAD AT POST WANI TAL DINDORI NASHIKMAHARASHTRA...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Principal Saint Patrik School V/S Veerendra Singh Pawar
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 319
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pawar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pawar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pawar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.