Court Name: Chhindwara
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. PAWER
Respondant Advocate MR. SATISH DESHPANDE
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/114/2010( Date of Filing : 07 Sep 2010 )1. SMT. KOSHYALYA PAWARJUNNARDEV DISTT. CHHINDWARA MP............Complainant(s)Versus1. AADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITIPALA CHOURAI DISTT. CHHINDWARA ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. MR.KIRTI ...
Case Number: 114
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2018
Hospital Sushrut Hospital Pawar
Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate ADV. RAJESH PATHAK
Respondant Advocate ADV. R.K.SAWLANI
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 15-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VINAYAK KULKARNI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/864(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2011 in Case No. 125/2010 of District Nashik)1. AMBER SEEDS & FARMSTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR PRANAV NANDKISHOR RATHI R/AT PRAYANRAJ SAROJI...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRATAP V PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/675(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/10/2009 in Case No. 82/2009 of District Raigarh)1. SHRI VIKRAM JAYSINGH PATILM/S HANSRAJ BUILDERS & DEV HVING OFFICE AT 204 MAYURESH COSMOS P...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PRATAP V PATIL
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/4131. SHRI VIKRAM JAYSINGH PATILM/S HANSRAJ BUILDERS & DEV HVING OFFICE AT 204 MAYURESH COSMOS PLOT NO 37 SECTOR -11 CBD BELAPUR NAVI MUMBAITHANEMAHARASHTRA ......
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashok Dhondiram Jadhav / R. R. Mahagaonkar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/383(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/06/250 of District Sangli)1. Shri. Dattatray Keshav UttekarR/o. Gorakhpur, Pirwadi, Tal. and Dist. SataraSataraMaharashtra.....
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
United India Insurance Insurance Pawar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR AKSHAY SHINDE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/615(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/03/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/10/62 of District Kolhapur)1. SMT SHANTABAI BALKRISHNA PAWARR/O SONALI TAL KAGAL KOLHAPURMAHARASHTR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJENDRA DURE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/212(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/01/2011 in Case No. 32/2010 of District Solapur)1. M/S KRISHIDHAN SEEDS PVT LTD THROUGH ABHAY S/O SURESH ANDURE PLOT NO D-3 TO D-6 ADDL MIDC ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Adv.A.D.Khapare
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Court,PARBHANIDistrict Consumer Court ,New Administrative Building,Near Telephone Bhavan PARBHANIComplaint Case No. CC/10/252 1. Shakuntala Rangnath PawarR/o Wazure Tq.PurnaParbhaniMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Tahsildar,PurnaTahsildar,Tahsil Offi...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate Sudhir kotval
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/39/20111. Sarala dodha pawarDindori road,Nashik...........Complainant(s)Versus1. New india insuranceAgra road,nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. R.S.Pailwan PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. V.V.Dani MEMBER PRESENT:Sudhir kotval, Advocate for the Compl...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pawar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pawar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pawar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.