company-name-logo

Patanjali

Latest Judgments

Total 54 Consumer Court Cases Against Patanjali.

Haryana

Manager Patanjali V/S Narinder Sukhan

Patanjali  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no. 41of 2019 Date of instt.: 26.03.2019 Date of Decision 08.05.2019Narinder Sukhan Advocate SCF 10, Sukhan Market, Model Town, Karnal. DH/Complainant VersusManager, Patanjali, D-26, Pushpanjali, Bijwa...

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-05-2019

Rajasthan

Patanjali Biscuits pvt ltd. V/S Seema Kumawat

Patanjali  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Virendra Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 788

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2019

Rajasthan

Patanjali Biscuits pvt ltd. V/S Kailash Kumawat

Patanjali  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Virendra Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 783

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2019

Rajasthan

Patanjali Biscuits pvt ltd. V/S Kailash Kumawat

Patanjali  

Court Name: Jaipur-IV

Appelant Advocate Virendra Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 784

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2019

Punjab

Patanjali Aorig Kendra V/S Baljeet Sharma

Patanjali  

Court Name: Muktsar

Appelant Advocate Gurpreet Singh Sandhu

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2018

Haryana

Patanjali Kissan Sewa Kender V/S Raj Kumar

Patanjali  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Naresh Chauhan

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.14 of 2017 Date of instt. 12.01.2017 Date of decision:08.03.2018Raj Kumar son of Shri Kalatar Singh resident of village Agondh, District Karnal. …….Complainant Versus1. Patanjali Kissan...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-03-2018

Haryana

Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. V/S Ravinder Kumar Gilhotra

Patanjali  

Court Name: Ambala

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Rajpoot

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA Complaint case no. : 286 of 2016Date of Institution : 22.07.2016 Date of decision : 28.02.2017Ravinder Kumar Gilhotra son of Shri Satnam Dass, Resident of Parveen Sadan, 205, Phase 03, Jaggi ...

Case Number: 286

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2018

Haryana

RAJ PAL V/S PATANJALI KISSAN SEWA KENDER AND OTHERS

Patanjali  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate GURMAIL SINGH DUHAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No.05 of 2018Date of Institution: 24.01.2018Date of Decision: 27.02.20181. Patanjali Kissan Sewa Kender, Shop No.33, Mahila Ashram Market, Karnal, through Sher Singh alias Rishi Pal Nehra.2. Nehru S...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2018

Haryana

RAJ PAL V/S PATANJALI KISSAN SEWA KENDER AND OTHERS

Patanjali  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate GURMAIL SINGH DUHAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No.14 of 2018Date of Institution: 20.02.2018Date of Decision: 27.02.20181. Patanjali Kissan Sewa Kender, Shop No.33, Mahila Ashram Market, Karnal, through Sher Singh alias Rishi Pal Nehra.2. Nehru S...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2018

Chandigarh

Patanjali Biscuits Pvt.Ltd., V/S Sahib Singh

Patanjali  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

A letter has been received by this Forum from the OP wherefrom it is revealed that the matter has been settled between the parties. The OP has also attached a cheque dated 14.6.2017 issued in favour of the complainant. None has come present on behalf of the complainant. Case has ...

Case Number: 144

|

Date of Filing: 28-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-07-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Patanjali in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Patanjali ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Patanjali under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.