Panchayat
Latest Judgments
Total 1230 Consumer Court Cases Against Panchayat.
Panchayat Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Office, Gorebal V/S Lagumappa president, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, Sindhanoor
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Hanumanthappa Budihal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/12/651. Lagumappa president, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, SindhanoorR/o. gorebal, Tq. SindhanoorRaichurKarn...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panchayat Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Office, Gorebal V/S Lagumappa President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, Sindhanoor
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Hanumanthappa Budihal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/12/661. Lagumappa President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, SindhanoorR/o. Gorebal, SindhanoorRaichurKarnatak...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panchayat Development Officer, Gorebal V/S Sri. Hanumanth S/o. Durgappa, Sindhanoor
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Hanumanthappa
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/12/531. Sri. Hanumanth S/o. Durgappa, SindhanoorAge: 37 years, Occ: Agricultrist, R/o. Hanchinal, RaichurKarnataka......
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panchayat Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Gorebal, Sindhanoor V/S Lagumappa President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, Sindhanoor
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Hanumanthappa Budihal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/12/581. Lagumappa President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, SindhanoorR/o. Gorebal, Tq. SindhanoorRaichurKarn...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panchayat Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Gorebal, Sindhanoor V/S Lagumappa, President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, Sindhanoor
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Hanumanthappa Budihal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/12/591. Lagumappa, President, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Dalit Horata Samiti, SindhanoorR/o. Gerebal, SindhanoorRaichurKarnata...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Post Master Bhopal V/S Accountant Jila Panchayat Hoshangabad
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
SHIVRAJ S.SIKARWAR V/S NAGAR PANCHAYAT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2015
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2015
Ashok Pandharam,Secretary,Garm Panchayat Office,Nagbhid V/S Ishwar Tulsiram Amrutkar
Court Name: Chandrapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/631. Ishwar Tulsiram AmrutkarR/o Nagbhid Tah NagbhidChandrapurM.S............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ashok Pandharam,Secretary,Garm Panchayat Office,NagbhidTah NagbhidChandrapurM.S.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. .S.K.Teware PRESIDENTHONABLE ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
JILLA PANCHAYAT KACHERI +1 V/S J.K. DAMOR
Court Name: Panch Mahals
Appelant Advocate S.D. PAGI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panchayat in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panchayat ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panchayat under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.