company-name-logo

Panchayat

Latest Judgments

Total 1231 Consumer Court Cases Against Panchayat.

Madhya Pradesh

collector bhind jila panchayat bhind mha parabandhak bhind V/S kashmeer singh

Panchayat  

Court Name: Bhind

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate SHRI SHIVRAM SHARMA

Case Number: 177

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2016

Madhya Pradesh

C E O JANPAD PANCHAYAT V/S MAHILA CHANDRAKUNAR

Panchayat  

Court Name: Tikamgarh

Appelant Advocate M S YADAV

Respondant Advocate AJAY NAGAR

Case Number: 52

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2016

Punjab

PSPCorp LTD V/S Gram Panchayat vill nabhipur

Panchayat  

Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib

Appelant Advocate Sh PC Joshi

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FATEHGARH SAHIB.C.C. No. 42 of 01.04.2014 Decided on: 18.03.2015Gram Panchayat of village Nabipur, Tehsil and District Fatehgarh Sahib through its Sarpanch Smt.Parkash Kaur.……..Complainant VersusPunjab State Power Corporat...

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-04-2015

Himachal Pradesh

Secretary Nagar Panchayat V/S Nisha Kumari

Panchayat  

Court Name: Una

Appelant Advocate Sh. S.C. Sharma

Respondant Advocate Sh. K.D. Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNADISTRICT UNA (HP).Complaint Case No. 138/2012(Hmr)1. Nisha KumariD/o. Late Sh. Brij Lal, R/o. Ward No.6, NAC Bhota, Teh Barsar, District Hamirpur (HP) 177001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Secretary Nagar PanchayatBhota, ...

Case Number: 138

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2015

Rajasthan

SECRETRY GRAM PANCHAYAT NARSINGHPURA V/S 531/2014 GUDDI DEVI

Panchayat  

Court Name: Ganganagar

Appelant Advocate SHREE KRISHAN RAM

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2015

Madhya Pradesh

CEO , JILA PANCHAYAT V/S SMT. SUNITA

Panchayat  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1563 OF 2015(Arising out of order dated 01.12.2015 passed in Execution Case No.36/2014 by District Commission, Jabalpur)1. SMT. JIGNA BHATIA, D/O LATE SHRI YASHWANT KUMAR BHATIA, ...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2023

Kerala

M/s TRANS ASIA TELE SYSTEMS V/S SECRETARY,RAMANATTUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYAT

Panchayat  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/366/20141. SECRETARY,RAMANATTUKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATRAMANATTUKARA PO-673633...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s TRANS ASIA TELE SYSTEMSKANCHAS BUILDING,Near NEW BUS STAND,RAJAJI ROAD,KOZHIKODE-42. MUHAM...

Case Number: 366

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2015

Punjab

Gurmeet Singh V/S Gram Panchayat Chugha

Panchayat  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Nakul Sharma

Respondant Advocate

FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH. First Appeal No.1455 of 2011 Date of Institution: 27.09.2011 Date of Decision : 11.02.2015Gram Panchayat Village Chugha, Tehsil Jalalab...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 27-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2015

Karnataka

Panchayat Development Officer V/S Om Hegde Urutota

Panchayat  

Court Name: Uttara Kannda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate R R Anvekar

Case Number: 187

|

Date of Filing: 27-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2020

Orissa

Executive Officer, Chhamundia Gramya Panchayat V/S Pitabas Behera

Panchayat  

Court Name: Nayagarh

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKHANDAPARA ROAD, NAYAGARH, ODISHA 752069Execution Application No. EA/10/2013InCC/51/20121. Pitabas Behera Dankari Sahi , Rasanga, Gania, Nayagarh BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAM CHANDRA DAS PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SARITA TRIPATHY MEMBERHON'BLE MR. B...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panchayat in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panchayat ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panchayat under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.