Panchayat
Latest Judgments
Total 1230 Consumer Court Cases Against Panchayat.
Executive Officer, Gram Panchayat V/S N.V. Seetha Ramaiah, S/o Late Vengaiah, Aged 64 years, Hindu, Business
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate Sri B.Rama Subba Reddy
Respondant Advocate Sri M.L.Srinivasa Reddy
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/67/20051. N.V. Seetha Ramaiah, S/o Late Vengaiah, Aged 64 years, Hindu, BusinessResident of Mukkamalla Village, Sanjamala Mandal, Kurnool DistrictKurnoolAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Officer, Gram PanchayatKoilakun...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DIGVIJAY CIMENT COMPANY LIMITED V/S BAVA SIMAROLI GRAM PANCHAYAT
Court Name: Junagadh
Appelant Advocate D D DEVANI
Respondant Advocate H D DEVANI
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-1998
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2020
Mankua Panchayat V/S Lataben B. Sheth
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate B.V.Sheth
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2005
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2020
Damnagar Gram Panchayat V/S Narandas Muldas
Court Name: Amreli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-1998
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2015
The Chief Officer, Town Panchayat V/S B.P.Nagaraj
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate M.M.Kariappa
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/2005/10 B.P.Nagaraj ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Chief Officer, Town PanchayatThe President, Town Panchayath ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Com...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Chief Officer, Town Panchayat V/S V.V.Krishnappa
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate M.M.Kariappa
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/2005/6 V.V.Krishnappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Chief Officer, Town PanchayatThe President, Town Panchayath ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: C...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Chief Officer, Town Panchayat V/S N.V.Anand
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate M.M.Kariappa
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/2005/7 N.V.Anand ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Chief Officer, Town PanchayatThe President, Town Panchayath ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Compla...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Chief Officer, Town Panchayat V/S M.Bannari
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate M.M.Kariappa
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/2005/8 M.Bannari ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Chief Officer, Town PanchayatThe President, Town Panchayath ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Compla...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Chief Officer, Town Panchayat V/S V.K.Nagaraj
Court Name: Kodagu
Appelant Advocate M.M.Kariappa
Respondant Advocate
THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/2005/9 V.K.Nagaraj ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Chief Officer, Town PanchayatThe President, Town Panchayath ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Comp...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SARPANCH BHAVNATH GRAM PANCHAYAT V/S ANANDDAS GURUMAHAVIRDAS
Court Name: Junagadh
Appelant Advocate H M VAIDYA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-1993
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panchayat in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panchayat ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panchayat under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.