company-name-logo

Panchayat

Latest Judgments

Total 1230 Consumer Court Cases Against Panchayat.

Gujarat

JILLA PANCHAYAT V/S TIMAKABEN THE WIFE OF LALAJIBHAI VASAVA

Panchayat  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate MR S. P. PANDYA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 92

|

Date of Filing: 25-09-1992

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2020

Andhra Pradesh

The Excutive Engineer, Panchayatraj Division, Panchayat V/S P.Venkata Rami Reddy, Contractor,

Panchayat  

Court Name: Kurnool

Appelant Advocate Sri.M.Azmathulla

Respondant Advocate Smt.D.S.Sai Leela

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/154/20091. P.Venkata Rami Reddy, Contractor,H.No.25/117, Sanjeeva Nagar, Nandyal, Kurnool district-518 501Kurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Excutive Engineer, Panchayatraj Division, PanchayatKurnool-518 001KurnoolAnd...

Case Number: 154

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

PARANJAPE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V/S MUMBAI GRAHAK PANCHAYAT THROUGH HON. SECRETARY

Construction   Panchayat  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate SHIRISH V. DESHPANDE

Respondant Advocate N/A

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHICONSUMER CASE NO. 410 OF 2002 1. MUMBAI GRAHAK PANCHAYAT THROUGH HON. SECRETARYGRAHAK BHAVAN SANT DNYANESHWAR MARGVILE PARLE WESTMUMBAI - 400 056 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PARANJAPE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY34 MAHATMA GAN...

Case Number: 410

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2002

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2010

Karnataka

Secretary, Gram Panchayat V/S Manjuanth Ramchandra Bhat

Panchayat  

Court Name: Uttara Kannda

Appelant Advocate Vagesh Hegde

Respondant Advocate V.A.Todurkar

Case Number: 98

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2020

Madhya Pradesh

THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. L.T.D.BETUL V/S NAGAR PANCHAYAT BETUL BAZAR

Panchayat  

Court Name: Betul

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11-2022

NCDRC

ARAKKULAM GRAM PANCHAYAT & ANR. V/S T.L. BABY

Panchayat  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 12 Feb 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/739/2010(Against the Order dated 03/11/2009 in Appeal No. 148/2006 of the State Commission Kerala) 1. T.L. BABYThannickal House, Elappilli P.O.Moolmattom ...........Ap...

Case Number: 739

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 28-04-2010

Kerala

Panchayat Officials V/S Bhasuran

Panchayat  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CDRF THIRUVANANTHAPURAMCDRF THIRUVANANTHAPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/10/112 1. BhasuranAyirumkadu Veedu,Karathakadavu,ChirayinkilTVMKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Panchayat OfficialsAnchuthengu Panchayath, ChirayinkilTVMKerala ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONARABLE MR....

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 12-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MAHARASTRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION&ORS V/S AKHIL BHARATIYA GRAHAK PANCHAYAT

Panchayat  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR.VIDYESH B.NASHIKKAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. FOX MANDAL & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3894 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 25/02/2009 in Appeal No. 1238/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. AKHIL BHARATIYA GRAHAK PANCHAYAT ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MAHARASTRA DEVELOPMENT CO...

Case Number: 3894

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2009

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2010

Kerala

V.Bhaskaran V/S Mararikulam south Grama panchayat

Panchayat  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate T.G.Sanalkumar

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. A/09/26(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Alappuzha) 1. Mararikulam south Grama panchayatMararikulam PRESENT : ORDER KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONVAZHUTHACAD, THIURVANANTHAPURAMFIRST APPEAL 26/2009ORDER DATED: 24.2.2010...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Kachchh District Panchayat V/S Ranba H. Jadeja

Panchayat  

Court Name: Kachchh

Appelant Advocate B.V. Seth

Respondant Advocate B.M. Dholakia

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panchayat in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panchayat ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panchayat under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.