company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Maharashtra

VIJAY SALES MAHIM BRANCH PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD.AND ORS V/S MR.VIKAS V.PATHARE

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate POA MR.S.PATHARE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Panasonic A.C. Service Centre V/S Khurram Khan

Panasonic  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate A. K. Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 149

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC INDIA PVT LTD V/S MITHELESH KUMAR

Panasonic  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 99

|

Date of Filing: 16-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 23-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC V/S SHAMIM KHAN

Panasonic  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 836

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2022

Rajasthan

PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S INAMEI LAHI

Panasonic  

Court Name: Jodhpur-II

Appelant Advocate INAMEI LAHI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 94

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2018

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2022

Haryana

Panasonic India Pvt Ltd V/S Somendra Pratap Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Ms. Seema Singh

Respondant Advocate Sh. Kapil Kher

Case Number: 669

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Haryana

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Khushi Ram Jakhar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Digvijay Jakhar

Respondant Advocate Sh. Yoginder Singh Dalal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/346( Date of Filing : 07 Sep 2020 )1. Khushi Ram JakharS/o Sh. Hari Singh, R/o A92, Preet Vihar, Rohtak-124001............Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.,12th Floor, Ambience...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Panasonic Company Pvt.Ltd. V/S Ravinder Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate None

Case Number: 366

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Maharashtra

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Santosh Kabir Kamble

Panasonic  

Court Name: Sangli

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 05-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 17-08-2022

Maharashtra

PANASONIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHRS. V/S RAJINDER RISHI.

Panasonic  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV. AKASH MENON.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI SUBURBAN NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, OPP.DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (EAST), DISTRICT-MUMBAI SUBURBAN -400 051, MAHARASHTRA.Complaint Case No. CC/283/2018( Date of Filing : 24 Jul 2018 )1. RAJINDER RISH...

Case Number: 283

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.