Panasonic
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.
M/S. PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD, V/S MR . S.A. PARIKH
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच,मुंबई उपनगर जिल्हा, मुंबई.प्रशासकीय इमारत, 3 रा मजला, डॉ.बाबासाहेब आंबेडकर उद्या�...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PANASONIC LTD+02 V/S R.M. PATEL
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate D.M.SONI
Respondant Advocate A. O. CHUDGAR
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2021
PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD, V/S MR RAMESH B. PARIKH
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate B. MENON
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/3201. MR RAMESH B. PARIKHURMI, PLOT NO. 10, POLICE OFFICERS SOCIETY, FISHERIES UNIVERSITY ROAD, SEVEN BUNGLOW, VERSOVA, MU...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panasonic India Pvt Ltd, V/S Jobby Varghese,
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/98/20121. Jobby Varghese, Madassery House, Anjukandy, Kannur City, Kannur Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt Ltd, 6th Floor, SPIC HOUSE, Annexe no 88, Annasali, 600032ChennaiThamilnadu, ...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD. V/S MITHILESH PANDAY
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1339
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 29-03-2016
National Panasonic Service Dept. V/S Sachin N. Kulkarni
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/11/261. Sachin N. Kulkarni25, Guruprasad Colony, Shahu Colony Lane No.1, Karvenagar,Pune 411052...........Appellant(s)Versus1. National Panasonic Service Dept.Shop No. 13, Shreniwas apartment, 584, Narayan peth, Kelkar Road, Near Kanya School, Pune 41...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Panasonic Service Center. V/S Mr. Shanjay K Chaudhari
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/411. Mr. Shanjay K ChaudhariPARVATI PAYATHA JANATA VASAHAT DATTA MANDHIR PUNE- 09 PUNE MAHA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Service Center.NARAYAN PETH PUNE 30 PUNEMAHA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri. S. K....
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD, V/S YAMSHI AHMED
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SURESH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1841. YAMSHI AHMEDKOHINOOR-II, 101-B, INDRA DARSHAN CROSS ROAD, LOKHANDWALA, ANDHERI-WEST, MUMBAI-53............Complainan...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PANASONIC AVC NETWORKS INDIA C.LTD.,REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, V/S J.MOHAN REDDY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S M.R.HARSHA
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/765/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/05/2010 in Case No. CC/620/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)1. J.MOHAN REDDYS/O LATE BUCHI REDDY,R/O H.NO.16-11-220/D/29,MOOSARAMBAGH,HYDERABAD............Appellant(s)Versus1. PANASONIC AVC NETWORKS INDIA C.LTD.,REP.BY ITS AU...
Case Number: 765
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANAGING DIRECTOR,NATIONAL PANASONIC INDIA AND OTH V/S MR YOGESH PATEL
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.consumer case(CC) No. 2006/122 MR YOGESH PATEL ...........Appellant(s)Vs.MANAGING DIRECTOR,NATIONAL PANASONIC INDIA AND OTHNEUTRON ...
Case Number: 2006
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.