company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Gujarat

Panasonic Customer Care Service Act. D-172 V/S Dr. Ketanbhai N. Lakhatariya

Panasonic  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate B N Dafatari

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2015

Punjab

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lt. Kuljas Rai Sharma

Panasonic  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabExecution Application No. EA/15/23InComplaint Case No. CC/14/911. Lt. Kuljas Rai SharmaWard no.6, Golden Avenue, Dadwan Road, DhariwalGurdaspurPunjab...........Appellant(s)Ver...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 11-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 30-09-2015

Punjab

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajpal Singh S/o Mohinder Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh Gurcharan Singh

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/90/20151. Rajpal Singh S/o Mohinder SinghR/o 214/18,Deol NagarJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Ind...

Case Number: 90

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2015

Chhattisgarh

The Managing Director, Panasonic & Ors. V/S Rashikh Khan

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Present in Person

Respondant Advocate R-1 &3 Shri Laxman Singh Gurang/R-2 Shri K.K.Sharma

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-09-2015

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC V/S AMIT CHANDRA

Panasonic  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1128

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2015

Punjab

Panasonic India Pvt Ltd V/S Rithu Joshi

Panasonic  

Court Name: Ludhiana

Appelant Advocate Rajiv Kumar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No. : 809 of 27.11.2014 Date of Decision : 24.08.2015Rithu Joshi, age 27, wife of Sh.Rohit Joshi son of Sh.Parshotam Lal Joshi, residents of House No.B-34/5724, Raghubir Park, Street No.8, Jassian Road, Ludhi...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-09-2015

Rajasthan

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd V/S Santosh Chanchawat

Panasonic  

Court Name: Udaipur

Appelant Advocate Manoj Siroya

Respondant Advocate Munna Lal Ahir

Case Number: 505

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2015

Kerala

BRANCH MANAGER, PANASONIC INDIA V/S SHAJI ABRAHAM

Panasonic  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate TOM JOSEPH

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/15/1361. SHAJI ABRAHAMANAKUZHIYIL HOUSE ALAPUARM ELANJI.PO MUVATTUPUZHA-686665...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BRANCH MANAGER, PANASONIC INDIA2ND FLOOR,JOSEPH AND VALENTINE BUILDING , SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE ...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 23-09-2015

Kerala

Panasonic India V/S Divya V K

Panasonic  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/2871. Divya V Kkeshavadhasapuram,pattom,tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Indiaarasali,chali,Tvpm............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir PRE...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 11-08-2015

Chandigarh

Pawan Kumar Nanda V/S New Tec Electronics, Panasonic Service Centre

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Judge, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T.,CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.:27 of 2015Date of Institution:30.07.2015Date of Decision:03.08.2015New Tec Electronics, Panasonic Service Centre, SCO No.495-496, First Floor, Sector 35-C, Chandigarh, through its Proprietor Narinde...

Case Number: 27

|

Date of Filing: 30-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.