Panasonic
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd V/S Sanjay Kothari
Court Name: Udaipur
Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kothari
Respondant Advocate Munna Lal Ahir
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2015
Mr. Balwinder Singh & ors. V/S Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Er. Sandeep Suri
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL LOK ADALATSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.304 of 2015Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.D-7, 5th Floor, Nanak Chambers, Opposite Fun Cinema, Near Laxmi Industrial Estate, New Link Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400 058.Sh.Narind...
Case Number: 304
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2015
M/S PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD. V/S RAJAN BABBAR.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint case No.:189 of 2015Date of Institution:11.09.2015Date of Decision:12.12.2015Rajan Babbar s/o Sh.B.L.Babbar, R/o House No.14 C, Railway Colony, Tipra, Kalka, Distt. Panchkula.. ….ComplainantVersus...
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2015
Panasonic India Pvt.Ltd Others V/S Raj Kumar Tiware
Court Name: Jabalpur
Appelant Advocate Manish singh Chohan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2015
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.(Corporate office) V/S Hari Om S/o Late Anant Ram
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/75/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/458/20141. Hari Om S/o Late Anant RamR/o Village Sofi Pind,(New Abadi),P.O. Kukar Pind...
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2015
Panasonic India Pvt.Ltd V/S Pawan Kumar
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Charanjit Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. C.C. No. 313/8.5.2015 Decided on : 7.12.2015Pawan Kumar s/o Sh. Lekh Raj, resident of Plot No. 25, St. No. 4, Gurpreet Nagar, Noorwala Road, Ludhiana. … Complainant VersusPanasonic India Pvt. Ltd., C-52, 1st...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2015
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ravinder Sharma
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Abhisek Aggarwal
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2016
(Through Managing Director ) Panasonic Appliances India Company Limited V/S Mr. Sadashiva Polnaya
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/303/20151. Mr. Sadashiva PolnayaAshwini House, Bhagavathi Temple Road, Ullal Mangalore 575020 Dakshina KannadaKarnataka ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. (Through Managing Director ) Panasonic Appliances India Company LimitedNo. 88, 6th Floor...
Case Number: 303
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2016
PANASONIC INDIA PVT.LTD AND OTHER V/S PEERA RAM
Court Name: Barmer
Appelant Advocate R.K.GODE
Respondant Advocate MANISH SHARMA
Case Number: 161
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2015
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Pawan KUmar Nanda
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Devinder Kumar Advocate
Respondant Advocate Anu Dhiman,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:153/2015Date of Institution:20.03.2015Date of Decision:19/11/2015 Pawan Kumar Nanda s/o Sh.K.K.Nanda r/o # 3365, Sector 15-D, Chandigarh ... Complainant.Versus1. Panansonic India Pvt. Ltd., First...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.