company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Madhya Pradesh

PANASONIC INDIA Pvt.Ltd. V/S LAXMINARAYAN KUSHWAH

Panasonic  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate BRAJESH GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 525

|

Date of Filing: 07-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2016

Kerala

Panasonic india (P)ltd V/S P.Surendran Nadar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/16/671. P.Surendran NadarSanthinekathan,Aruvikara,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic india (P)ltdSpik building annex,VI Floor 88,chennai............Opp.Party(s) B...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-02-2016

Chandigarh

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Ranvir Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:626/2015Date of Institution:29.10.2015Date of Decision:08.02.2016 Ranvir Singh r/o # 80,New Police Colony, Sector 26, Chandigarh. ... Complainant.Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., First Floor, AB...

Case Number: 626

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Gujarat

Panasonic mobile India Pvt. Ltd. V/S YASH KISHORBHAI MODI

Panasonic   Mobile  

Court Name: Surat

Appelant Advocate JAGDISH PARMAR

Respondant Advocate SELF

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 23-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Haryana

PANASONIC INDAI PVT.LTD &ors. V/S NAVJOT SIROHI.

Panasonic  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate ABHINEET TANEJA.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:213 of 2015Date of Institution:05.10.2015Date of Decision:05.02.2016Navjot Sirohi s/o Sh.Dharampal, R/o Flat No.1204, GH-4A, Sector-20, Panchkula.….ComplainantVersus1. Panasonic India Pv...

Case Number: 213

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2016

Chandigarh

Panasonic Mobile Service centre V/S Sh. Manbahadur

Panasonic   Mobile  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

Before the Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 574 OF 2015Manbahadur Vs Panasonic Mobile Service Centre and othersBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI, MEMBER/LO...

Case Number: 574

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-12-2016

Bihar

Manager, In charge, Marketing Office Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd, & Ors. V/S Sri Basukichandra Choudhary

Panasonic  

Court Name: Muzaffarpur

Appelant Advocate Sri Shambhu Prasad & Bhashakar Kumar

Respondant Advocate Sri Vinod Kumar Jha

...

Case Number: 127

|

Date of Filing: 10-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2017

Madhya Pradesh

PANASONIC INDIA Pvt Ltd V/S VED PRAKASH UPADHYAY

Panasonic  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate NEELESH SINGH TOMER

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 374

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2016

Punjab

Panasonic India Pvt.Ltd. V/S Sandeep Sethi

Panasonic  

Court Name: Ludhiana

Appelant Advocate Mohit Kapila Adv.

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Forum LudhianaRoom No. 7, Old Wing, New Judicial Complex, Ferozepur Road Ludhiana.Final Order Complaint Case No. CC/15/3611. Sandeep Sethi Ludhiana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt.Ltd.ModelTown, Ludhiana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BL...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 05-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Panasonic V/S Ratan Lal

Panasonic  

Court Name: Ratlam

Appelant Advocate Sunil Parikh

Respondant Advocate Absent

Case Number: 49

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-12-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.