Panasonic
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.
PANASONIC CUSTOMER CARE CENTRE V/S MS AFRIN KHATOON
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/489/20091. MS AFRIN KHATOON H NO. 158 BLOCK - B FIRST FLOOR, THOKAR NO. 8 SHAHEEN BAGH, JAMIA NAGAR OKHLA NEW DELHI 110024...........Compl...
Case Number: 489
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. & another V/S Lalana Mangesh Harmalkar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P. Narulkar
Respondant Advocate Dilip Gaonkar
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2016
Panasonic Showroom V/S Gurtej Pal Singh S/o Sh Charan Singh
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh H.S. Kathar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/79/20161. Gurtej Pal Singh S/o Sh Charan Singh R/o House No.252,Mota Singh NagarJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD. 1 V/S GRAHAK SURAKSHA JAGRUT MANCH 1
Court Name: Vadodra Addl
Appelant Advocate D.D.LALWANI
Respondant Advocate BANKIM S PANCHOLI
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S T.S Sasi
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate Sooraj M Kartha
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/252/20161. T.S SasiThadathil Nariyanani P.O.KottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.Ist Floor ABW Tower IFFCO Chowk GurgaonHariyana2. The Manager Authorised service centre Pa...
Case Number: 252
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2017
Manager Panasonic Mobile Company V/S Ganesh Nayak
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate Puneet Verma
Respondant Advocate K.K. Parasar
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2016
The Managing Director, Panasonic India Private Ltd., V/S P.Rambabu, S/o Lat P.Papabhatt
Court Name: Chittoor-II at triputi
Appelant Advocate K.Subramanyam Raju
Respondant Advocate
Filing Date:-29-06-2016. Order Date:-04-11-2016.BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, CHITTOOR AT TIRUPATI PRESENT: - Sri.M.Ramakrishnaiah, President Smt.T.Anitha, MemberFRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, TWO...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2016
Panasonic India(P)ltd V/S M.V Sachu
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/16/3011. M.V SachuAswathy bhavan,TC 43/1653,manacadu,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India(P)ltd37/2022,javahar nagar,kadavanthara,Kochi............Opp.Party(s...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2016
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Harmeet Singh S/o Sh Dilbagh Singh
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/138/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/214/20151. Harmeet Singh S/o Sh Dilbagh SinghR/o 131,Paragpur,PO Dhannowali.............
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2016
Panasonic Consumar Care Service & Others V/S Nikendra Kumar Patel
Court Name: Jabalpur
Appelant Advocate Manish Singh Chouchan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 552
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.