company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

West Bengal

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd V/S Sunetra Konar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Burdwan

Appelant Advocate Santi Ranjan Hazra

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM166 Nivedita Pally, Muchipara, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,Dist Burdwan - 713103Complaint Case No. CC/36/20161. Sunetra KonarRani Sayar Easr ,R.C Das Road ,Pin 713101BurdwanWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Lt...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 08-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2017

Madhya Pradesh

PANASONIC SMART FONE V/S MAYANK MISHRA

Panasonic  

Court Name: Indore-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2018

Delhi

PANASONIC AVC NETWORKS INDIA CO. LTD. V/S AFRIN KHATOON

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NISHANT PARWER

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Arguments: 14.02.2017 Date of decision : 16.02.2017First Appeal No. 37/2017In the matter of:Afrin KhatoonW/o Nishat PerwezR/o B-158, First FloorShaheen Bagh, Thoker No. 8Jami...

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2017

Rajasthan

Panasonic Customer Care Service, CEO V/S Amit kumar saha

Panasonic  

Court Name: Kota

Appelant Advocate Narendra Singh Rajawat

Respondant Advocate Jitendra pathak

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2017

Delhi

RAVI KUMAR & ANR. V/S PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD.

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate KAPIL KHER

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :10.02.2017Revision Petition No. 182/2016(Arising out of the ex-parte order dated 24.2.16 passed in Complaint Case No.1671/15 passed by the District Consumer Dispute ...

Case Number: 182

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 28-02-2017

Rajasthan

Panasonic india pvt ltd V/S Yash bithu

Panasonic  

Court Name: Bikaner

Appelant Advocate Dheeraj choudhary

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 245

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2017

Madhya Pradesh

PANASONIC INDIA V/S NIKHIL GOKHRU

Panasonic  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 384

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-05-2017

Punjab

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Tirath Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: Muktsar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Girdhar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-02-2017

Punjab

Panasonic India Ltd. V/S Vijay Kumar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate Inderjit Lakhra

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/5401. Vijay Kumar8, Gali no.5, Gopal Nagar, Majitha Road, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Ltd.6th floor, Spic ...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-02-2017

Karnataka

The Panasonic Brand Shop V/S B.Shivaprasad,

Panasonic  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/1922/20151. B.Shivaprasad,R/at No.63, 1st Cross, Govindareddy Layout, Arakere Mico Layout, Bengaluru 560 076. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Panasonic Brand ShopUnit Of Methods Automotive Pvt. Ltd., No.315/A, 9th Main, 5th Block, Jayan...

Case Number: 1922

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.