company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Gujarat

SWAMI IMPEX SURENDRANAGAR , PANASONIC SERVICES STATION SURENDRANAGAR , PANASONIC SERVICES STATION A V/S KISHORBHAI K RAMANUJ

Panasonic  

Court Name: Surendranagar

Appelant Advocate R. U. JANI

Respondant Advocate P. B. MAKWANA

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-06-2017

Delhi

PANASONIC V/S RIYAL

Panasonic  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 702/14Mohd. RiyazR/o H. No. 272, Kotla VillageNear Gurjar Maha SabhaDelhi – 110 091 ….ComplainantVs.Prince A...

Case Number: 702

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2017

Rajasthan

PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S BRAJ MOHAN

Panasonic  

Court Name: Jaipur-III

Appelant Advocate RAJESH VERMA

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 461

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2017

Gujarat

PANASONIC CUSTAMER CARE SERVISHS 2 V/S JAYKUMAR R.VAKHARIYA

Panasonic  

Court Name: Vadodra Addl

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 21-04-2017

Haryana

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd V/S Nitin Kumar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Kuldeep Singh Tarar

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint no. 95 of 2017Date of instt.: 09.03.2016Date of decision 11.04.2017Nitin Kumar son of Sh. Pala Ram, Age 25 Years, resident of village Khabra, Distict Fetehabad at present House No. 346, Mann Colony, Kaithal Ro...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 09-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-04-2017

Chandigarh

Panasonic India Private Limited V/S Sneh Lata

Panasonic  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Khunger Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Dated :05/04/2017ORDER Sh. Vipul Sachdeva, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file afresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant wo...

Case Number: 306

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 06-04-2017

Rajasthan

Panasonic india pvt ltd V/S Murli agarwal

Panasonic  

Court Name: Bikaner

Appelant Advocate Hiralal joshi

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 05-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2017

Karnataka

Panasonic Service Network, Customer Service Panasonic, & ANother V/S Niranjan Roy,

Panasonic  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENTSRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBERComplaint Case No. CC/1515/20151. Niranjan Roy, 38. MIG K.S. Town, Bangalore-650060.....

Case Number: 1515

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2017

Karnataka

M/s Jaina Marketing & Associates Of Panasonic Mobile Phones, V/S A.D. Ramananda,

Panasonic   Mobile  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate GDS

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 533

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2017

Kerala

SHAJI ABHRAHAM V/S PANASONIC INDIA

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SATHEESH MURTHY

Respondant Advocate

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL No.223/16JUDGMENT DATED:23.03.2017PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V JOSE : MEMBERBranch Manager,Panasonic India, 2nd floor, Joseph & Valentine Building, : APPE...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.