Panasonic
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.
PANASONIC V/S AKHILESH
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92NATIONAL MONTHLY LOK ADALAT08.09.2018 (2nd Saturday)Complaint case no. 424/16Akhilesh Kamle vs. Panasonic MobileORDER Case was taken up in Lok Adalat. The cas...
Case Number: 424
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2019
M/s Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ravi Verma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 645
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2018
Manager , Panasonic India Pvt Ltd., & another V/S Gunasekar
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate S.Natarajan
Respondant Advocate Party in Person
Date of Filing : 16.11.2010 Date of Order : 23.07.2018DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)@ 2ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 3.PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B. : M...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2018
Panasonic Ltd through Marketing Manager Pradeep Jain V/S Anand Vyankatrao Harde
Court Name: Bhandara
Appelant Advocate Adv U.D.Tidke
Respondant Advocate ADV. TALMALE
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BHANDARANear Akhil Sabhagruha, Ganeshpur Road,BhandaraComplaint Case No. CC/17/27( Date of Filing : 17 Mar 2017 )1. Anand Vyankatrao HardeR/o C/o Prakash Raoji Khobragade,Gurukunj Colony,Vidyanagar, BhandaraBhandaraMaharashtra..............
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2018
PANASONIC INDAI PVT.LTD V/S ALPESHBHAI KIRTIBHAI JANI
Court Name: Surat
Appelant Advocate JAYSHREE PANCHAL
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2018
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd V/S Harshad Rajendra Parikh
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate A. A. Malpani
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2018
THE MANAGER PANASONIC INDIA Ltd V/S V P ABDUN NAJEEB
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ABDUL SHUKOOR ARACKAL
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.405/16JUDGMENT DATED:21.06.2018PRESENT : HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI. S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENTSHRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH : JUDICIAL MEMBERSHRI. RANJIT. R : MEMBERV. M. Abdunnajeeb, S/o...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2018
Panasonic Company V/S S. Jayaprakash
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/220/2017( Date of Filing : 28 Sep 2017 )1. S. JayaprakashAssariparambil moolavattom P OKottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic CompanyBehind Vrindhavan Complex Chaliyil Rd.KottayamKerala2. ...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2018
Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ram Kumar
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jitender Swami
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/18/99( Date of Filing : 03 May 2018 )1. Ram KumarS/o Sh. Meva Ram R/o Village Alupur, Tehsil Madlauda.PanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.6th Floor SPIC HOUSE Annexe, No. 8...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2018
Panasonic Customer care service D172,okhta Industrial Area V/S Dr.Darwin Samuel
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.Kuryan Chunkath
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/16/565( Date of Filing : 07 Oct 2016 )1. Dr.Darwin SamuelMandumpal House,Ollur.P.O,Thissur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Customer care service D172,okhta Industrial AreaDelhi2. Jaina Marketing...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.