company-name-logo

Oneplus

Latest Judgments

Total 69 Consumer Court Cases Against Oneplus.

Uttar Pradesh

ONEPLUS INFRASTRUCTURE V/S DR. GAJANAND BARANWAL

Oneplus  

Court Name: Azamgarh

Appelant Advocate S.N. RAI

Respondant Advocate

जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष आयोग- आजमगढ़।परिवाद संख्या 108 सन् 2021प्रस्तुति दिनांक 30.08.2021 ...

Case Number: 108

|

Date of Filing: 19-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 29-12-2021

Maharashtra

OnePlus India Pvt Ltd, through Managing Director V/S Mrs Niharika Sumit Tiwari

Oneplus  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune

Appelant Advocate Adv S R Tiwari

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 21-12-2021

Telangana

Oneplus India Pvt Ltd,Rep by its Authorized Signatory V/S Huzefa Raaj

Oneplus  

Court Name: Rangareddi

Appelant Advocate Pip

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 139

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2020

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2021

Haryana

ONEPLUS INDIA AND OTHERS V/S VANDANA MALHOTRA

Oneplus  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate VARAUN CHAWLA

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1358 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 13.11.2017 Date of Decision: 19.12.2019Vandana Malhotra wife of Rajneesh Malhotra, resident of House No.935, Sector-17, Panchkula, Haryana. Mobile No.981412...

Case Number: 1358

|

Date of Filing: 13-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2020

Haryana

ONEPLUS INDIA (REGISTERED OFFICE) AND OTHERS. V/S VANDANA MALHOTRA

Oneplus  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate VARUN CHAWLA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:04 of 2018Date of Institution:23.01.2018Date of Decision:20.11.2019Vandana Malhotra w/o Sh.Rajneesh Malhotra, R/o H.No.935, Sector-17, Panchkula, Haryana. ….ComplainantVersus1. Onep...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2019

Chandigarh

Oneplus India V/S Saahil Soni

Oneplus  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Mohit Jaggi Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:612/2018Date of Institution:05.11.2018Date of Decision:15.02.2019Saahil Soni son of Mr.Ravinder Kumar Soni age about 35 years r/o H.No.5172, Ground Floor, Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, Chandig...

Case Number: 612

|

Date of Filing: 05-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2019

Maharashtra

1. MANAGER M/S ONEPLUS STORE V/S UMESH MANGESH KHANOLKAR

Oneplus  

Court Name: Thane

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

THANE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMRoom No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector Office Building, Thane-400 601Complaint Case No. CC/707/2018( Date of Filing : 05 Dec 2018 )1. UMESH MANGESH KHANOLKARSAI VIBHUTI CHAWL NO 1,ROOM NO 2,NEAR SAI SAWALI CHAWL,GARIBACHA WADA,MAHATMA PH...

Case Number: 707

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 01-01-2019

Chandigarh

Oneplus India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sarthak Jain

Oneplus  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Goel Adv.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:95/2018Date of Institution:09.02.2018Date of Decision:27.07.2018Sarthak Jain s/o Mr.Rajinder Jain r/o H.No.1171, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh-160022. ... Complainant.Versus1. Oneplus India Pvt. Ltd., th...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2018

Chandigarh

Oneplus India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sarthak Jain

Oneplus  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Goel Adv.

Respondant Advocate

The counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cau...

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Oneplus in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Oneplus ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Oneplus under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.