Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
ANKUR GUPTA V/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SOUMYAJIT PANI
Respondant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KAUSHIK & MS. HIMANSHI SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 102 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/11/2016 in Complaint No. 309/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, SCO 1...
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2017
Omaxe Limited V/S Shri Parkash S/o Moji Ram
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.P. Verma
Respondant Advocate Mannu Malik
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2017
SURENDER MALIK V/S OMAXE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 598 of 2016Date of Institution: 04.07.2016Date of Decision : 02.05.20171. Omaxe Limited, Office at 7 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its Manager.2. Omaxe Limited, Kumaspur, ...
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2017
Omaxe Ltd. V/S 1. Vikram Singh
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. J.P. Hooda
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 09-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2017
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2017
LAVINDER MANN & ANR. V/S M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1298 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 22/08/2016 in Complaint No. 165/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/9952/20161. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANA...
Case Number: 1298
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kirpal Singh Mooner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma & Devinder Kumar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:873 of 2016Date of Institution:01.12.2016Date of Decision:01.05.2017Kirpal Singh Kooner son of Sh.Ajmer Singh, resident of House No.2702-B, Sector 42-C, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u...
Case Number: 873
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Dilip Goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Shukla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:897 of 2016Date of Institution:08.12.2016Date of Decision:01.05.2017Dilip Goyal son of Sh.J.P. Goyal, resident of House No.28, Central Government Officers Residential Complex, Sector 38-A, Chandigarh....
Case Number: 897
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Anuj Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Navneet Jindal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:898 of 2016Date of Institution:09.12.2016Date of Decision:01.05.2017Mr.Anuj Gupta resident of House No.A-404, GH-5, Sanskriti Apartments, Sector 43, Gurgaon, Haryana.……ComplainantV e r s...
Case Number: 898
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Deepesh Aggarwal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Shukla & A S Kang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:897 of 2016Date of Institution:08.12.2016Date of Decision:01.05.2017Dilip Goyal son of Sh.J.P. Goyal, resident of House No.28, Central Government Officers Residential Complex, Sector 38-A, Chandigarh....
Case Number: 915
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.