Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bipin Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Geeta Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record and all...
Case Number: 387
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2017
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S Smt. KAVITA JINDAL
Court Name: Palwal
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV TAYAL
Respondant Advocate AUTH REP.
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Amarjit Kaur Walia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Lakhbir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 329
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Hoshiyar Singh Kadian
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjit Kadian
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Kashmir Nehra
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.K. Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Develpers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shruti Chhabra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Davinder Lubana
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:11 of 2017Date of Institution:06.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Shruti Chhabra aged 37 years, wife of Sh.Arvind Chhabra.Arvind Chhabra aged 44 years, son of Sh.M.L. ChhabraBoth are residents of Hou...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lalitha Saini
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Varinder Arora, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:11 of 2017Date of Institution:06.01.2017Date of Decision:05.05.2017Shruti Chhabra aged 37 years, wife of Sh.Arvind Chhabra.Arvind Chhabra aged 44 years, son of Sh.M.L. ChhabraBoth are residents of Hou...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr. Shubham Setia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
By filing this complaint, the complainants are seeking refund of amount of Rs.18,62,784.48. It is on record that even Buyer’s Agreement has not been signed between the parties and possession of the unit, in question, has not been offered. At the time of arguments, sett...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rajeev Shastri
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:919 of 2016Date of Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision:05.05.2017Rajeev Shastri S/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar r/o Vill. Kharar, P.O. Kharota, Tehsil Jawali, Distt. Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, current residin...
Case Number: 919
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd. V/S Naresh Kumar Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained fo...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.