Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Arshdeep
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Singh Brar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Dated: 23/05/2017ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 that Opposite Party No.1 will return an amount of Rs.21,71,800/- to the complainant with interest @8.5% p.a. (simple) from t...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2017
OMAXE CITY V/S RAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: Jaipur-III
Appelant Advocate PRAMOD KUMAR
Respondant Advocate K.S. SHARMA
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
OMAXE CITY V/S PRMOD KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: Jaipur-III
Appelant Advocate PRMOD KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 706
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd, V/S Ajay Kumar Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nitin Gupta & Gaurav Gupta
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Dated: 19/05/2017ORDER Photocopy of Settlement Deed has been placed on record. Counsel for both the parties state that in view of above, this complaint has become infructuous. In view of above, the complaint stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. Certified copies o...
Case Number: 685
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. V/S Rakesh Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No.:930 of 2016Date of Institution:16.12.2016Date of Decision:19.05.2017Mr.Rakesh Kumar son of Sh.Kamer Chand Gogna, aged 40 years, House No.99, Milk Colony, Dhanas, Chandigarh.Mr.Raju Gogna son of Sh.M.L...
Case Number: 930
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Bipin Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Geeta Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record an...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Megh Raj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Somesh Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:966 of 2016Date of Institution:28.12.2016Date of Decision:17.05.2017Megh Raj aged about 67 years, son of Late Sh.Mohan Dass, resident of House No.1184, Phase-9, Mohali (SAS Nagar).……Comp...
Case Number: 966
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
M/s Omaxe Limited V/S Vikas manchanda S/o Shyam Manchanda
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.K. Antil
Respondant Advocate Mannu Malik
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
HIRA LAL MITTAL V/S OMAXE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, Panchkula First Appeal No : 704 of 2016Date of Institution: 01.08.2016Date of Decision : 16.05.2017M/s Omaxe Limited, Registered Officer: 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its authorized representativ...
Case Number: 704
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
OMAXE LTD. V/S SRS.SUNITA RAWAT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate JANGVIR SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 351 of 2017 Date of Institution: 28.03.2017 Date of Decision: 15.05.2017Mrs. Sunita Rawat wife of Jitender Rawat, resident of House No.DU 908, Sawal Vihar, G.T. Road, Palwal. Appellant-Compla...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.