company-name-logo

Omaxe

Latest Judgments

Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers V/S Smt. Anjana Goyal

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:80 of 2017Date of Institution:24.01.2017Date of Decision:31.07.2017Smt. Anjana Goyal Wife of Shri Rajesh Kumar Goyal Resident of House No.831 Sector 38/A, Chandigarh. .........Complainant. VersusM/s ...

Case Number: 80

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers V/S A R Goyal

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:81 of 2017Date of Institution:24.01.2017Date of Decision:31.07.2017Shri A.R. Goyal Son of Late Shri Patram Dass resident of House No.46, Sector 12 A, Panchkula Haryana. .........Complainant. VersusM/...

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2017

Haryana

Omaxe Ltd. V/S Rajesh Suhag

Omaxe  

Court Name: Jhajjar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Jaswant Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 65

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2017

Haryana

1. OMAXE LIT. ,2. SHRI VENKIAT RAO,3. BRANCH MANAGER OMAXE LTD. V/S SATWANTI BAJAJ W/O RAMESH CHANDER BAJAJ

Omaxe   Bajaj  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate PANKAJ TYAGI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-07-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Shri Vijay Garg

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record ...

Case Number: 547

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Smt. Promila Bansal

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record ...

Case Number: 550

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2017

Haryana

Omaxe Construction Ltd. V/S Jaidarth S/o Pale Ram

Construction   Omaxe  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Satish Chander

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 01-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-07-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Pardeep Sheoran

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vijay Pal

Respondant Advocate

ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. On submitting one p...

Case Number: 264

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2017

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. ltd. V/S Naresh Kumar Sharma

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

ORDER Most of the amount stood paid. There is dispute only qua small amount. It may be an error of calculation. It is on record that on 04.04.2017 indicating above mistake/claiming above amount, the applicant sent one notice to the judgment debtors/Opposite Parties. However, whe...

Case Number: 246

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2017

Haryana

Omaxe Ltd. V/S Karan Singh Dahiya

Omaxe  

Court Name: Jhajjar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Bharat Jain

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 275

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-07-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.