Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. This complaint was filed claiming refund of Rs.20,98,600/- alongwith other reliefs. The Opposite Parties in their written statement admitted payment of Rs.17,28,600/- only. It has been stated that cheque dated 27.09.2016 i...
Case Number: 407
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.S.BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1290 of 2016 Date of Institution: 28.12.2016 Date of Decision: 22.09.2017Sat Parkash Gautam son of Om Parkash Gautam, resident of 301, Cyber Port Tower, 3rd Floor, Omaxe Heights, Sonepat. Appellan...
Case Number: 1290
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.S.BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1291 of 2016 Date of Institution: 28.12.2016 Date of Decision: 22.09.2017Dr. Sanjay son of Shri Ram Dhan, resident of 105, Cyber Platinum Tower, Omaxe Site, Sonepat. Appellant-ComplainantVersusM/s...
Case Number: 1291
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.S.BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1292 of 2016 Date of Institution: 28.12.2016 Date of Decision: 22.09.2017Savitri wife of Azad Singh Dahiya, resident of Flat No.201, Platinum Tower, Omaxe Heights, Sector 8, Sonepat. Appellant-Com...
Case Number: 1292
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate DATTA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 918 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 03/06/2016 in Complaint No. 268/2015 of the State Commission Punjab)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENTION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR/PARTNER/AUT...
Case Number: 918
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anil Malik, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one under Section 25 or 27 as the case may be, after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is ...
Case Number: 335
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN GARG
Respondant Advocate
N THE DELHI STATECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :12.09.2017Date of Decision :15.09.2017 Complaint No.1419/2017IN THE MATTER OF:Smt. Anita, W/o. Shri Suresh Kumar Garg,R/o. Flat No.7...
Case Number: 1419
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 740 of 2016Date of Institution: 12.08.2016 Date of Decision: 11.09.20171. Omaxe Limited, Office at 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its Managing Director Rohtash Goel....
Case Number: 740
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
ORDER In terms of order passed by us on 21.07.2017, Counsel for the Opposite Parties has placed on record one affidavit, Paras 2 & 3 which reads thus:-“2. That the green area on the backside is available exclusively to the allottee, who is on the ground floor, raised on...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.