Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Akash Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sandeep Phatak
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party on getting instructions from the Company that for the delayed period whereof 07.07.2014 on the amount paid upto that dat...
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rakesh Dagar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 200
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2018
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rakesh Dagar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 205
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL, MS. CHARANJEET KAUR BHATIA & MS. MEENA BANSAL
Respondant Advocate M/S. PRAVIN BAHADUR & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2775 OF 20171. ANIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR.SRI KESRI DASS JAIN, RESIDENT OF H.NO. B-XII-1642, MOTI BAZAR,MALERKOTLA,PANJAB2. SMT RENU JAIN,W/O SRI ANIL KUMAR JAIN,RESIDENT OF H.NO.B-XII-1642, MOTI BAZAR, MALERKO...
Case Number: 2775
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lalit Kaushik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 447/2017( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2017 )1. Tejpal Singh S/o Sh. Gurcharan Singh R/o Lajpat Nagar, Delhi............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd.Subhash Chander Gogia, Director M2M Buildtech ...
Case Number: 447
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
Court Name: Palwal
Appelant Advocate V.R. RAWAT
Respondant Advocate AUTH REP.
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application was filed, when cheque issued towards second installment payable on 15.12.2017 was dishonoured. It is stated that the said amount was transferred with penalty amount to the account of the decree holder/complainant. During pendency of this execution appl...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KARTAR SINGH MALIK-1
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No : 58 of 2017Date of Institution: 03.02.2017Date of Decision : 12.03.2018Parveen Kumari daughter of Shri Rajinder Singh Lohchab, Resident of House No.1095, Sector 1, HUDA, Rohtak, now at Dwarka, Delhi. Co...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the parties that the matter stands settled. It has been agreed by the Opposite Parties to refund the entire amount deposited by the complainants with the Opposite Parties, with interest @8% p.a. from the respective dates of deposit. The entire payment,...
Case Number: 634
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.