Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers (P) Ltd. V/S Sonika Bhardwaj
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate H.S. Awasthi
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 730 OF 2017Sonika Bhardwaj & anr. Vs M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers (P) Ltd. BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.H....
Case Number: 730
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Tarun Kumar Verma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.S.Toor
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Harvinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Counsel for the complainant states that the matter stands settled between the parties. In view of this, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties, free of charge....
Case Number: 92
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2018
M.D. M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Rajat Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 529
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2018
Omaxe V/S Neeta Dhawan
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lalit Kaushik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 446/2017( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2017 )1. Neeta Dhawan W/o Sh. Pardeep Dhawan R/o Sector1 HUDA Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. OmaxeSubhash Chander Gogia, Director M2M Buildtech Pvt Lt...
Case Number: 446
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
Omaxe V/S Vipin Gupta
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lalit Kaushik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 448/2017( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2017 )1. Vipin Gupta S/o Om Parkash R/o Old Housing Board Colony, Karnal............Complainant(s)Versus1. OmaxeSubhash Chander Gogia, Director M2M Buildtech Pv...
Case Number: 448
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Mrs. Sarita
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lait Kaushik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 445/2017( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2017 )1. Mrs. Sarita W/o Sh. Phool Kumar R/o VPO Jindran Tehsil Kalanaur, district Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd.Subhash Chander Gogia, Dir...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ms. Runjhun Mittal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Sachdeva
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Mrs. Palvinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kabir Sarin, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:764 of 2017Date of Institution:31.10.2017Date of Decision:26.03.2018Mrs.Palvinder Kaur, w/o Mr.Sukhwinder Singh, r/o Flat No.5123/3, Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, Chandigarh U.T. through Sh.Tejin...
Case Number: 764
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lakhmir Singh Sandhu
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ORDER Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the matter stands settled between the parties. To show the above fact, settlement deed dated 21.03.2018 has been placed on record. It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that in view of settlement, no claim of the decree...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.