Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:768 of 2017Date of Institution:31.10.2017Date of Decision:25.04.2018Col. Virender Singh son of Sh.Gian Chand Thakur, Commanding Officer, 11 Field Regiment (ZOJILA), PIN-925711, c/o 56 APO.…&hel...
Case Number: 768
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Grover, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:581 of 2017Date of Institution:01.08.2017Date of Decision:25.04.2018Mrs.Preeti Sehgal, W/o Mr.Vikrant Sehgal, R/o H.No.3075, Sector 38-D, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sOmaxe Chandig...
Case Number: 581
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2018
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.S. Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sud, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
When post-dated cheque given by the judgment debtors was dishonoured, this execution application was filed. It is stated at the bar by Counsel for both the parties that entire amount alongwith penalty amount stands transferred in the account of the decree holder. In view of above...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.216 of 2017 Date of Institution : 10.04.2017 Order Reserved on : 17.04.2018 Date of Decision : 19.04.2018Surinder K...
Case Number: 216
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. We appreciate the stand taken by both the parties. In continuation of our order passed on the last date of hearing i.e. 06.04.2018, Counsel for the Opposite Party, on getting instructions, ...
Case Number: 654
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:555 of 2017Date of Institution:18.07.2017Date of Decision:16.04.2018Renu Arora wife of Shri Dinesh Gupta, R/o F-15, Panjab University, Sector 14, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s O...
Case Number: 555
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2018
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/643/2013( Date of Filing : 12 Dec 2013 )1. Mukesh KumarDelhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe BuildhomePvt.Ltd.Gautam Buddh Nagar............Opp.Party(s) BEF...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jaswant Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 540/2017( Date of Filing : 15 Sep 2017 )1. Mamta Rani W/o Sunil Kumar R/o H.No. 445, Village Kharawar, District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe HappyII Rohtak, Jhajjar Rohtak ...
Case Number: 540
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jaswant Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 539/2017( Date of Filing : 15 Sep 2017 )1. Ram Niwas S/o Mozi Ram, R/o H.No. 445, Village Kharawar District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe HappyHome II Rohtak, Jhajjar Rohtak Roa...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.