Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMA
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate ASHWANI KUMAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/230/2018( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2018 )1. BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMAD/O SH. MURARI LAL SHARMA R/O1909/10,KUCHA ...........Complainant(s...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2018
M/s. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Ltd. V/S Neeraj Gautam
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.S.Toor
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 256
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Nikhil Choudhary
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harpreet Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
OMAXE LTD. V/S RAJESH SUHAG
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARMOD CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1151 of 2017Date of Institution: 26.09.2017Date of Decision : 14.05.2018Rajesh Suhag son of Sh. Om Parkash, resident of D-10, Arya Nagar, Jhajjar, Haryana. Appellant-ComplainantVersusOmaxe City Baha...
Case Number: 1151
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2018
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Sukhbir Grewal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.S.Jagdeva
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB SECTOR 37-A, DAKSHIN MARG, CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.809 of 2017 Date of Institution : 13.09.2017 Order Reserved on : 09.05.2018 Date of Decision : 11.05.2018Ms. Sukh...
Case Number: 809
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2018
OMAXE LTD. V/S SUSHILA DHULL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ASHISH RAWAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 629 of 2017Date of Institution: 22.05.2017Date of Decision : 09.05.2018Sushila Dhull wife of Rajbir Singh Dhull, resident of House No.771/21, Teacher Colony, Bahadurgarh, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, Distric...
Case Number: 629
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Ltd. V/S Rakesh Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nitish Garg
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2018
KIRAN BALA V/S OMAXE LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1284 of 2016Date of Institution: 28.12.2016Date of Decision: 03.05.2018M/s Omaxe Limited, 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019, through its authorized representative namely Atul Arya....
Case Number: 1284
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rohan Goel
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggaral, Adv.
At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties, on getting instructions from Sh. Deepanjit Singh, Senior Manager (Legal) that the Opposite Parties are ready to refu...
Case Number: 771
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Malti Singla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Raj & Anshu Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
At the time of arguments, it is stated by Counsel for the complainant that due to technical flaw in the complaint file, let the complaint be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file it again, after giving better particulars. To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by...
Case Number: 797
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.