Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Pvt. Ltd. V/S Arun Batta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harsh Nagra
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Komal Gandhi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, to satisfy the claim raised by the decree holder, Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors has handed over two cheques bearing Nos.208478 dated 21.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.6 Lakhs and 208479 dated 22.09.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,98,042/- to Sh....
Case Number: 231
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd., V/S Ms. Puneet Kooner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
During arguments, it is stated that the matter has been settled. Copy of settlement deed has been placed on record. Noting above facts, Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate, Counsel for the complainant states that this complaint be dismissed as withdrawn having been settled between the p...
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Tasvir Singh Rathee
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.S. Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Santosh Kumari
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.S. Verma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Vivek Jain
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Execution Application No.:EA/64/2015Date of Institution: 27/04/2015Date of Decision: 27/08/20181. Vivek Jain son of Sh.Junninder Kumar Jain r/o House No.3228/1, Sec-40-D, Chandigarh.2. Raman Jain (mother of co...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Priyanka Ahuja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amandeep Singh Nirmaan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per Buyer’s Agreement dated 06.07.2012, the opposite party committed to hand over possession of the unit (flat), in question, on or before 03.07.2015. The possession has not been delivered till today. Counsel for the opposite party states that possession is likely to be ...
Case Number: 732
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2018
M/s omaxe chandigarh developers pvt.ltd and another V/S Surinder Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 586
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Dr. Sunil Sethi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:788 of 2017Date of Institution:09.11.2017Date of Decision:10.08.2018Dr.Sunil Sethi S/o Sh.H.C., Sethi, R/o H.No.542, Sector 11-B, Chandigarh.…… ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe Chandigarh...
Case Number: 788
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2018
M/S. OMAXE LIMITED & ANR. V/S RAKESH KATYAL & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. DPSA LEGAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1102 OF 20171. RAKESH KATYAL & ANR.S/o. I.L. Katyal, R/o. D-86, East Of Kailash, New Delhi - 110 065.2. Sudershana RaniW/o. I.L. Katyal, R/o. D-86, East of Kilash,New Delhi - 110 065............Complainant...
Case Number: 1102
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.