Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
A Settlement Deed dated 15.10.2018, signed by both the parties, has been placed on record. Both the Counsel for the parties are in agreement that in view of above, let this complaint be dismissed as having been fully satisfied. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of the order b...
Case Number: 859
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
A Settlement Deed dated 15.10.2018, signed by both the parties, has been placed on record. Both the Counsel for the parties are in agreement that in view of above, let this complaint be dismissed as having been fully satisfied. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of the order b...
Case Number: 858
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Kumar Chaudhary, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
A Settlement Deed dated 18.10.2018, signed by both the parties, has been placed on record. Both the Counsel for the parties are in agreement that in view of above, let this complaint be dismissed as having been fully satisfied. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of the order b...
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:138 of 2018Date of Institution:04.04.2018Date of Decision:17.10.2018Sunil Bali S/o Sh.Madan Lal Bali, R/o 2 Power Station, P.O. Khairi, Tehsil Dalhousie, Chamba, Himachal Pradesh 176325.…&helli...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:69 of 2018Date of Institution:13.02.2018Date of Decision:17.10.2018Lakhbir Singh s/o Sukhdev Singh, resident of Village Dulchi Ke, District Ferozepur, Punjab.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s ...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:787 of 2017Date of Institution:09.11.2017Date of Decision:17.10.2018Smt.Sanjila Bansal, W/o Dr.Yogender Bansal, R/o # 1154, Sector 24-B, Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe Chan...
Case Number: 787
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H. K. Srivastava
Respondant Advocate anil kumar mishra
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/98/2015( Date of Filing : 14 May 2015 )1. Dharmendra GuptaLucknow...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Ltd. & Oth.Lucknow............Opp....
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Today in Court, four demand drafts bearing No.030890 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/-, 030891 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, 030892 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,86,981/- & 030893 dated 09.10.2018 in the sum of Rs.5,81,633/-, totaling Rs.23,37...
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1051 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 25/04/2018 in Complaint No. 768/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. OMAXE LIMITEDOMAXE DEVELOPERS PV TLTD, INIDA TRADE TOWER, 1 FLOOR, BADDI KURALI ROAD, NEW CHAN...
Case Number: 1051
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.