Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lt. Col. Jagmohan Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rupali S Verma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:187 of 2018Date of Institution:27.04.2018Date of Decision:29.11.2018Lt. Col. Jagmohan Singh S/o Lt. Col. (Retd.) Balbir Singh,Anupreet W/o Lt. Col. Jagmohan Singh,Both residents of Head Quarter, 67 In...
Case Number: 187
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2018
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Rajesh Suhag
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jaswant Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2018
m/s omaxe chandigarh extension developers ltd V/S Smt.swaran kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Safia Paul
Respondant Advocate
FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCHSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR-37 A, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.903 of 2018 Date of Institution : 19.11.2018Date of Decision : 22.11.2018Smt. Swaran Kaur W/o Sh. Hardeep Singh, R/o H.No.3508, Sector 35-D, Chan...
Case Number: 903
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Pushpa Devi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vijay Pal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:275 of 2017Date of Institution:31.03.2017Date of Decision:16.11.2018Pushpa Devi W/o Sh.Vijay Kumar, resident of House No.306, Sector 13, Hisar.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe Chandigar...
Case Number: 275
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Annkur Soni
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
On 21.09.2018, following order was passed by this Commission:- “On 17.04.2017, following order was passed by this Commission in CC/654/2017 :-“At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. We appreciate the stand taken by both the...
Case Number: 258
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2018
OMAXE LTD. & ANR. V/S EKNATH PATIL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NAMAN GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :02.11.2018Date of Decision : 04.12.2018 COMPLAINT NO.1330/2018In the matter of:Mr. Eknath Patil,S/o. Shri Decochand Zandu Patil,R/o. H.No.98, Sector-2/C,Saket Nagar, ...
Case Number: 1330
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Rajinder Kumar Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Kapil Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holders wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be reta...
Case Number: 307
|
Date of Filing: 29-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Geetanjali Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sud, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:245 of 2018Date of Institution:29.05.2018Date of Decision:31.10.2018Geetanjali Sood aged about 36 years wife of Sh.Gopal Jagota (daughter of Sh.Vinayak Sood), resident of #114/164, 45th Floor, Tower-D...
Case Number: 245
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2018
Case Number: 63
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2018
OMAXE LTD. V/S GOPIDEVI JHURANI
Court Name: Indore-II
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate RAJESH FARKYA
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.