Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Ms. Poonam Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V K Diwan, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:749 of 2017Date of Institution:23.10.2017Date of Decision:31.12.2018Ms.Poonam Sood wife of Sh.Sateekshan Sood aged about 56 years, resident of House No.1113-A, Sector 20-B, Chandigarh.Sh.Sateekshan So...
Case Number: 749
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Jaskaran Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tarun Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:517 of 2017Date of Institution:05.07.2017Date of Decision:31.12.2018Jaskaran Singh son of Lt. Sh.Sukhdev Singh, r/o H.No.2075/5, Lehal Colony, Patiala.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Omaxe C...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shri Rajinder Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:301 of 2018Date of Institution:25.07.2018Date of Decision:21.12.2018Shri Rajinder Garg aged 56 years, son of Late Shri Des Raj Garg, resident of House No.124, Sector 17, Panchkula, Haryana.Shri Rajiv ...
Case Number: 301
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension V/S Vijay Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:127 of 2018Date of Institution:02.04.2018Date of Decision:21.12.2018Shri Vijay Garg aged 61 years Son of Late Shri Des Raj Garg, resident of House No.30, Sector 8, Panchkula, Haryana.……C...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Promila Bansal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:126 of 2018Date of Institution:02.04.2018Date of Decision:21.12.2018Smt.Promila Bansal aged 58 wife of Balraj Bansal C/o Vijay Garg, House No.30, Sector 8, Panchkula, Haryana.……Complaina...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh & Ors. V/S Smt. Swaran Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Sofia Paul
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 983
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
M/s omaxe chandigarh developers pvt.ltd and another V/S Surinder singh virdi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 719
|
Date of Filing: 11-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2019
OMAXE Ltd. Corporate & 2 Others. V/S Ram Pratap Sahi
Court Name: Bahraich
Appelant Advocate Sri Devendra Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Sonia Sharma W/o Sh. Sharad Sharma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors not filed. It is stated by Counsel for the parties that an amount of Rs.60,000/- stood paid. Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the judgment debtors states that TDS Certificate qua the amount deducted towards income tax has als...
Case Number: 335
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Renu Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Gupta & Amit Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
ORDER It is stated by Counsel for the judgment debtors that after the last date of hearing, an amount of Rs.16,113/- has been paid through RTGS and further he had handed over TDS certificate for an amount of Rs.68,174/- in the name of both the complainants (half and half). He fu...
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.