company-name-logo

Omaxe

Latest Judgments

Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Rajeev Shastri

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill Adv. & Hoshiar Chand Adv.

Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.

On the last date of hearing i.e. 18.01.2019, following order was passed by this Commission:- “Vakalatnama on behalf of the judgment debtors not filed. Be filed on the next date of hearing. As regards relief qua handing over of physical possession of the unit, in question, t...

Case Number: 355

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2019

Punjab

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers V/S Preet Pal SIngh

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.S. Maini

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 72

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2019

Haryana

M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Smt. Neeti

Omaxe  

Court Name: Jhajjar

Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2018

|

Date of Upload: 25-02-2019

Punjab

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Gurjit singh Bhatia and another

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate b.s. taunque

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 841

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2019

Chandigarh

Kamal Kishore Gupta, Director M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar Khurana

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Somesh Gupta Adv.

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the decree holder(s) wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained ...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-02-2019

Punjab

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S j.l.jindal

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 718

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2019

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kanwar Pawanjit Singh

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Gaur, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the opposite parties states that the matter stands settled and settlement deed has been signed by the complainant. The authorized representative of the Company will sign it and in terms of settlement deed, the liability will be adjusted. ...

Case Number: 218

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2019

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Renu Gupta

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Goel, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.

As per the agreement, possession of the plot, in question, was to be offered on or before 21.01.2015 whereas it was offered only on 23.09.2017. In a way, there is a delay of 21 months in offering possession. Possession already stood given to the complainant on 12.10.2018. Now t...

Case Number: 184

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2019

Chandigarh

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers (P) Ltd. V/S Mrs. Preeti Sehgal

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Aditya Grover, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

On the last date of hearing i.e. 20.12.2018, following order was passed by this Commission:- “Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate for the judgment debtors has placed on record copy of order dated 11.12.2018 passed by Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, N...

Case Number: 296

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2019

Chandigarh

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashok Kumar Khurana

Omaxe  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holder wishes to withdraw this execution application with liberty to file a-fresh under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy b...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 16-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.