Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Paramjit Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajat Chopra
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2019
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Vinod Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nirmal Singh Jagdeva
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-09-2019
Case Number: 248
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2019
Omaxe LTd. V/S Varinder Kaushal
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sunil Kumar Saini
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Criminal Complaint No. 137 OF 2013in CC/540/2011Varinder Kaushal Vs M/s Omaxe Ltd.BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: None for Complainant.Sh.Manjinder Kuma...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited V/S Ms. Poonam Sood
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Maninder Singh Saini Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the judgment debtors, which is taken on record. It is stated that requisite amount stood paid and as such no grievance has left qua the said prayer. It is clarified that in terms of order dated 31.12.2018 passed by this Commission in Complaint Case...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2019
M/s Omaxe Ltd. V/S Surender Malik S/o Ram Kishan
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Sharma
Respondant Advocate Ramesh Dager
Present:-DH in person. Sh. Mannu Malik Adv. for the JD. File taken up today on the application filed by DH for seeking permission to withdraw the execution petition. Sh. Mannu Malik, Learned counsel for the JD has also put in appearance. DH-Surender Malik has made a statement th...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2019
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S NARESH KUMAR BHASIN
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments:23.07.2019Date of Decision: 02.08.2019 COMPLAINT NO.97/2015In the matter of:-Naresh Kumar Bhasin,4/19, Single Storey, Ramesh Nagar,VersusM/s. Omaxe Ltd.,Regd. Office: ...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2019
M/s Omaxe Limited V/S Varinder Kaushal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sushil Saini, Sanjay Dhiman, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Called second time at the end of the entire list. None came present on behalf of the applicant/appellant. Position was the same on 05.04.2019, 26.04.2019, 17.05.2019 & 21.06.2019. The above fact shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Ltd. V/S Ruchika Goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/158/2019( Date of Filing : 10 May 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/492/20171. Ruchika GoyalW/o Sh. Pankaj Goyal through her GPA Holder Namely Shri Harsh Aggarwal Corresponding address:- House No. 1...
Case Number: 158
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2019
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mayank Tyagi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ankur Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:119 of 2018Date of Institution:20.03.2018Date of Decision:09.07.2019Mayank Tyagi son of Sh.Dinesh Mohan Tyagi, resident of H.No.1088, First Floor, Sector 15-B, Chandigarh.Mamta Tyagi wife of Sh.Dinesh...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.