Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1187 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S MS. PRATIMA SAINI & ANR.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.C. RAJPAL
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 425
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2024
Omaxe Ltd. V/S Nirmala Panwar W/o Sh Ram Phal Panwar
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate S.K.Antil
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2024
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S AJAY VATS AND ANOTHER
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARUN TAKHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Date of Instituion:08.05.2019 Date of final hearing:23.05.2024 Date of pronouncement:11.06.2024Consumer Complaint No.143 of 2019IN THE MATTER OF1. Ajay Vats S/o Shri Satya Pal Vats,2. Narender Kumar Yadav S/o Shri B...
Case Number: 143
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 26-06-2024
DR. SUNDER CHAINTA V/S OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2022
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2024
PAWAN KAPOOR V/S M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. DEV RISHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1845 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 13/07/2018 in Complaint No. 11/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECOTR/AUTHORIZED ...
Case Number: 1845
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2024
Omaxe New Heights V/S Hari Om S/o Sadhu Ram
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Suresh Malik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2024
RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN V/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ( PRESENTLY KNOWN AS OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPES PVT. LTD.)
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. AKJ LAW ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 579 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 26/04/2022 in Complaint No. 1108/2018 of the State Commission Delhi)1. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ( PRESENTLY KNOWN AS OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPES...
Case Number: 579
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2024
OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, V/S MR. RAMAN DOGRA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH[Additional Bench]==================Complaint No.:09 of 2024Date of Institution:06.02.2024Date of Decision:07.05.2024Mrs. Raman Dogra, aged 46 years, W/o Sh. Ajay Dogra, Resident of House No.995, Sector 7-B, Chandigarh....
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2024
OMAXE NEW CHANDIGARH DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR/AUTHORIZED SI V/S SHRUTI CHHABRA W/O ARVIND CHHABRA
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate DEEPAK AGGARWAL AND GAUTAM KUMAR GOYAL
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:794 of 2022Date of Institution:25.11.2022Date of Decision:16.04.20241] Shruti Chhabra wife of Sh.Arvind Chhabra.2] Arvind Chhabra son of Sh.M. L. Chhabra,Both residents of House No.419, Sector...
Case Number: 794
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2024
M/S. OMAXE LTD. & ANR. V/S KAILASH KUMARI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate KARANJOT SINGH MAINEE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 25/10/2017 in Complaint No. 350/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KAILASH KUMARIW/O. SHRI. RAJESH. R/O. JOUSE NO.835, SECTOR-14. SONEPAT............Appellant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.