Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ashish Bansal adv
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:153 of 2021Date of Institution:04.03.2021Date of Decision:23.08.20221] Dr.Sunder Chainta, resident of Chainta Cottage, Aira Home, Near Happy Child School, Shimla2] Dr.Dimple Chainta wife of D...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2021
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2170 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 10/06/2019 in Complaint No. 125/2018 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR/DIRECTOS / ...
Case Number: 2170
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. ANKIT BHATTACHARYYA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 997 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 31/12/2018 in Complaint No. 517/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, 10. ...
Case Number: 997
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. ANKIT BHATTACHARYYA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 996 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 31/12/2018 in Complaint No. 518/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, 10....
Case Number: 996
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B.S. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 163 OF 20181. VISHAL BRAR & ANR............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED#10, Local Shopping Complex, Kalkaji, new delhi-110019...........Opp.Party(s) BEF...
Case Number: 163
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First Appeal No.768 of 2017Date of the Institution:23.06.2017Date of Decision: 22.07.2022M/s Omaxe Ltd., 7 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019 through its Managing Director/Chairman through its authorize...
Case Number: 768
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAHUL RATHORE & MS. PRIYANJALI SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2571 OF 20181. SANJAY KUMAR RAJDEVR/o D-001, Omaxe Grand, Sector-93B, Noida - 201305Uttar Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE BUILDHOME PRIVATE LIMITED R/o 10, Local Shopping Centre Kalkaji...
Case Number: 2571
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Shubham Manchanda
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/604( Date of Filing : 20 Nov 2019 )1. Lata Devi wife of Ajay KumarFlat no.624 Ground Floor, Omaxe City Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director M/S Omaxe Ltd. Office at...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Shri Shubham Manchanda
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/602( Date of Filing : 19 Nov 2019 )1. Bharat SachdevaS/o Premchand, Flat No. 509, Second Floor, Omaxe City, Rohtak, Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director M/s Omaxe L...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Shri Shubham Manchanda
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/601( Date of Filing : 19 Nov 2019 )1. Dayawanti Attriresident of 481, ground floor, Omaxe City, Rohtak Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing Director M/S Omaxe Ltd. Office At...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 19-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.