Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Inderjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate
Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/488/2021( Date of Filing : 22 Sep 2021 )1. Ravinder Sethi S/o Surjit Singh SethiFlate No. 102...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Limited & OthersOmaxe H. 7............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PRESENT:Dated...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES & DR. DEEPAK JINDAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 264 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 04/10/2018 in Complaint No. 109/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. MANAGING DIRECTOR , OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LTD. & ANR.ZONAL OFFICE INDIA TRA...
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2019
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. AMARJEET SINGH & NARENDER YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 668 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 14/11/2017 in Complaint No. 196/2017 of the State Commission Punjab)1. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA TRADE TOW...
Case Number: 668
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AFTAB SINGH KHARA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Sharma & Ramandeep Kaleka Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per office report, Counsel for the non-applicant/complainant has already received a Banker’s cheque bearing No.749591 dated 05.08.2022 for an amount of Rs.7,07,861/- in favour of the non-applicant/complainant and balance amount of Rs.1,60,449/- is lying deposited with th...
Case Number: 559
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2022
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2022
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/312/2013( Date of Filing : 04 Jun 2013 )1. Yadhvir Singh Kalka 180-c-1 Sainik Farms Khanpur Area New Delhi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 LSC Kalkaji New delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 312
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK GARG & R.C. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1599 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 25/05/2018 in Complaint No. 94/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 10, LOCAL SHOP...
Case Number: 1599
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PRAVIN BAHADUR & ASSOCAITES
Respondant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI SINGH, MS. RIDHI MUNJAL, SUDHANSHU SUMAN, MS. SAUMYA GUPTA, MR. N. MATEEN & MR. HARSH PRAKASH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2166 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/08/2017 in Complaint No. 411/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. OMAXE BUILD HOME PVT. LTD.10-LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KALKAJI.NEW DELHI-110019...........Appellant(s...
Case Number: 2166
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2022
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/125/2017( Date of Filing : 28 Mar 2017 )1. Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal4/411, GAGAN VIHAR, DELHI-110051............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENTER KALKA JI, NEW DELHI-110019................
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. ARJUN GROVER, ADITYA GROVER, SUMIT JIDANI & POOJA R. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1466 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 25/04/2018 in Complaint No. 581/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.INDIA TRADE TOWER, 1 FLOOR, MADHYA MARG EXT...
Case Number: 1466
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.