Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHALABH SINGHAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 345 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/01/2013 in Appeal No. 142/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/598/20131. OMAXE LIMITED7, LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRE, KALKAJINEW DELHI - 110019...........Petit...
Case Number: 345
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GUPTA, MR. MUNISH GUPTA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate MR. AWANISH KUMAR & MR. SHIV KUMAR PANDEY (R-1 TO 5)
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4048 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1054/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. M/S. OMAXE LTD.Through it Authorized Representative Namely Sh.Harsh Bhargav 7 Local Shoppping,K...
Case Number: 4048
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TANUJ KHURANA & MR. ISHAAN MADAAN,
Respondant Advocate MR. SHALABH SINGHAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 246 OF 2013 IN CC/63/20131. Mr. MANOJ JAIN & 6 ORS.,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/s OMAXE BUILDHOME PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS.,...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIH...
Case Number: 246
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TANUJ KHURANA & MR. ISHAAN MADAAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 245 OF 2013 IN CC/348/20121. ATUL MAHESHWARI & 2 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE BUILDHOME PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARI...
Case Number: 245
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2013
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate VIKAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate H.O. SHARMA
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 190/20131. SEEMA VATS W/O SANJAY VATSHOUSE NO. 222 SECTOR, 21B FARIDABAD BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Smt. PrabhaWati MEMBERHON'BLE MR. Sh. D.V. Rathee MEMBER For the Complainant:VIKAS SHARMA, Advocate For the ...
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate VIKAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate H.O. SHARMA
Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sonepat. Complaint No.191 of 2013Instituted on:12.04.2013 Date of order:22.01.2015Vandna Sahney wife of Vinish Sahney, resident of H.No.1397, Sector 15, Sonepat. ...Complainant. VersusOmaxe Construction Ltd. Registered unde...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1876 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 14/02/2011 in Appeal No. 344/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh) WITH IA/687/2013,IA/688/20131. SANDEEP SAXENAHOUSE NO557,SECTOR-11, PANCHKULAHARYANA............
Case Number: 1876
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GUPTA, MR. MUNISH GUPTA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 770 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/11/2012 in Complaint No. 24/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. OMAXE LTD. & ANR.SCO NO. 143-144, MADHYA MARG, SECTOR-8C, CHANDIGARHPUNJAB2. OMAXE LIMITED, OMAX...
Case Number: 770
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1 of 2013 1. Vani Jainw/o Tarun Jain H.No. 884-C, Jain Mohalla VPO Dera Bassi, Distt. SAS Nagar, Mohali ...........Respondent(s) For the Appel...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2 of 2013 1. Tarun JainH.No. 884-C, Jain Mohalla, VPO Dera Bassi, Ditt. SAS Nagar, Mohali ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For th...
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.