Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. GUPTA, MR. MUNISH GUPTA & MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 591 OF 2013 IN FA/770/20121. OMAXE LTD. & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SANJAY BATRA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RA...
Case Number: 591
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Harinder Kumar, complainant no. 2 in person
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta Adv. for OP
Complaint Case No. CC/27/20131. Sonica Bhardwaj w/o Sh. Harinder Kumar R/o House No. 3423 Sector-24/D, Chandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension DevelopersPvt. Ltd. SCO 139-140, Fisrt Floor, Sector-8/C, Madhya Marg, Chanigarh through its Director/...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Atul Nehra Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/372/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Mrs. Surender NehraChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Ltd. SCO 143-44, Sector-8/C, Chandigarh through its Manager...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRES...
Case Number: 372
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT BHARDWAJ, MR. P.K. GUPTA & MR. MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. PARVEEN KUMAR GARG
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2528 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/05/2012 in Appeal No. 23/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. OMAXE LTD.SCO No-143-144, Sector-8-C Through its Senior General ManagerChandigarhChandig...
Case Number: 2528
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/1051. Harwinderpal Singhsonof S.Nachhattar singh r/o villa No.400,Omaxe city Goniana road,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Buildhome pvt. ltd.corp office 7, LSC Kalkaji New Delhi-110019, throughits chairman/MD2. Omaxe Build Home pvt. ltd.Om...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/1281. Rupinder KaurSharma wife of Sh. Surinder Kumar Sharma r/o villa No.385.Omaxe city Goniana raoad, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Buildhome pvt. ltd.corp office:7,LSC Kalkaji New Delhi-110019, through its chairman/MD2. Bathinda Develo...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/1981. Baljit Singh Brar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Build Home Pvt. ltd.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. Vikramjit Kaur Soni PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. Amarjeet Paul MEMBERHONABLE MRS. Sukhwinder Kaur MEMBER PRESENT:Rohit Sharma, Advocat...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sourabh Goel Adv. for the complainants
Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Gupta, Adv. for OPs
Complaint Case No. CC/20/20131. Kiran AggarwalPanchkula...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.SCO 139-140, First Floor, sector-8/C, madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160018 through its Managing Director2. Branch ManagerOmaxe Chandigarh Extension De...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Divya Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 298 of 2012 1. Kuldeep Kumar SharmaR/o Ward No. 23, Near Khalsa School Mandir Wali Gali, Khanna, Punjab. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Omaxe Cha...
Case Number: 298
|
Date of Filing: 12-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MUKTI BODH & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. GAJENDRA BHAWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 630 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 04/09/2012 in Complaint No. 57/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. M/S. OMAXE LTD.7, Local Shopping Centre, kalkaji,NEW DELHI-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. BIKRAM...
Case Number: 630
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.