Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt. Divya Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta
Complaint Case No. CC/61/20131. Kuldeep Kumar SharmaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd.through Managing Director, 10, LSC Kalkaji, New Delhi-1100192. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd. through the Manager SCO...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan Kumar Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/502/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers LimitedChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Sukhpreet Singh KangHouse No. 2103, Sector-66, Mohali, throgh his father and General Power of Attorney Hold...
Case Number: 502
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ISHAAN MADAAN
Respondant Advocate MR. SUMEER SODHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4503 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/10/2013 in Appeal No. 523/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/303/20141. RITU ROHANI & ANR.W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND ROHINI, R/O A-77A, THIRD FLOOR,LAJPAT ...
Case Number: 4503
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/134/20131. Rajinder Kumar Midha BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint:CC/134/2013Date:26/03/2013Date:16/01/2014Ra...
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan KUmar Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sameer Sachedev, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/533/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. M/s Omaxe LimitedChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Sandeep Luthra son of Sh. K.C.Luthra Resident of House No. 608, IAS Society, Sector-49/A, Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE...
Case Number: 533
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 750 OF 2013 IN FA/738/20131. SONIKA BHARDWAJ & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTENSION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...
Case Number: 750
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Randhir Singh Advocate
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta
Complaint Case No. CC/62/20131. Randhir SinghChandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers(P) Ltd. through its Chief Executive Officer/Director/M.D, SCO 143-144, 1st Floor, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160008............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE M...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 04-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 738 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 10/09/2013 in Complaint No. 27/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. SONIKA BHARDWAJ & ANR.W/O. SH. HARINDER KUMAR R/O. 3423, SECTOR-24-D, CHANDIGARHPUNJAB 2. HARIND...
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Puneet Kumar Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/452/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Ms. Meera ChauhanPunjab BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T.,CHANDIGARH   ...
Case Number: 452
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Arshdeep S. Arora, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/413/20121. Sh. Narinder SinghS/o Sh. Manjit Singh R/o H.No. 3005, Sector 35D, Chandigarh2. Smt. Mohinder KaurD/o Sh. Karam Singh, R/O H.No. 3005, Sector 35D, Chandigarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Limitedthrough its Sh. Rohtas Goel, Chairman & Man...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.