Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAHUL RATHORE,
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNIL MUND
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 27 OF 2014 WITH IA/699/2014,IA/700/2014,IA/1041/2014,IA/7843/20141. Shri PRAYAGA VENKAT SURYA PRAKASH & 3 ORS.,S/o Shri P. R. K. Rao, Alexandra, B-501, Grand Omaxe, Sector-93B,NOIDA - 201304............Co...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3224 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/07/2014 in Appeal No. 196/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. GURBAX SINGH BAINSS/O. SHIV SINGH, R/O. H.NO. 206, PHASE-6,MOHALIPUNJAB-160056...........Pet...
Case Number: 3224
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. UTTAM DATT & MR. SHUBHAM AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3574 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/06/2014 in Appeal No. 202/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. ANKUR SOODS/O SH.ASHOK SOOD. FLAT NO-42/C, ARMY FLATS, SECTOR-44-ACHANDIGARH...........Petit...
Case Number: 3574
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-10-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2870 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 14/05/2014 in Appeal No. 87/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. KRISHAN KUMAR NANDA & ANR.S/O LATE SH.AMAR NATH NANDA, R/O HOUSE NO-821,SECTOR-12PANCHKULAHAR...
Case Number: 2870
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/648/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/05/2014 in Case No. CC/249/2011 of District South II)1. ARVIND KUMAR GARG66-B, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI............Appellant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 648
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Aggarwal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/202/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/04/2014 in Case No. CC/485/2012 of District DF-I)1. Ankur SoodChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd.Chd............Respondent(s) BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.] PRESIDENT DEV RAJ MEMBER PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRE...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. MUKTI BODH & CO.
Respondant Advocate M/S. LALL & SETHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 887 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 30/09/2013 in Complaint No. 55/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. OMAXE LTD.7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. IQBAL BEGU...
Case Number: 887
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan Kumar Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/87/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt.Ltd.Chd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Krishan Kumar Nandason of Sh. Amar Nath Nanda,R/o HOuse No. 821, Sector-12, Panchkula(Haryana)2. Mrs. Renu Nand...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY KUMAR
Respondant Advocate Mukti Bodh & Co.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 7 OF 20131. RAJAN SHARMA & ANR.S/o late Shri C. P. Sharma, D-22, Green Wood City,GURGAON2. Shri Hardesh ChawlaS/o Shri H. S. Chawla, 773, Sector 4, Urban Estate,GURGAON............Complainant(s)Versus1. OM...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KARAN DEWAN & MS. AANCHAL JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1711 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 15/01/2014 in Appeal No. 533/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. SANDEEP LUTHRAS/O SH.K.C LUTHRA, R/O HOUSE NO-608, IAS SOCIETY, SECTOR-49-ACHANDIGARH..........
Case Number: 1711
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.