Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1194 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Kulwinder Kaur
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Arora V.K. & Navyug Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/137/2015Date of Institution:04/03/2015Date of Decision:18/11/2015Kulwinder Kaur wife of Lt. Col. Hardev Singh Hundal, resident of House No.700, New Bank Wali Gali, Rayya District Amr...
Case Number: 137
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2015
Omaxe Construction Ltd V/S Kamlesh chauhan
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/398/20111. Kamlesh chauhan138-B 1st floor A-1 Block Janakpuri New Delhi-58...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Construction Ltd7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji new Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2015
OMAXE LTD. V/S Kapoor Singh
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Satbir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2015
Omaxe Ltd V/S Suresh Kumar Gupta
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/220/20101. Suresh Kumar GuptaE-49 Shivaji Road Adarsh Nagar Delhi-33...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji new Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JU...
Case Number: 220
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2015
Omaxe Ltd V/S Sachin Bhargava
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/221/20101. Sachin BhargavaC-67 Ashoka Enclave Part II Sector 37 Faridabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe LtdOmaxe House -7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji New Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BEF...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2015
OMAXE LTD. V/S MAHENDER SINGH RATHEE S/O CHANDGI
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate K.K. MALIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.39 of 2015 Instituted on:11.02.2015 Date of order:26.11.2015Mahender Singh Rathee son of Chandgi, r/o 28/236, West Ram Nagar, Sonepat.…Complainant. VersusOmaxe Ltd. 7 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaj...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2015
Case Number: 520
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2015
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Dev. Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr. Madan Lal Taneja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv
Respondant Advocate sh.Vansh Malhotra, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:153 of 2015Date of Institution:27.07.2015Date of Decision:03.11.2015Mr. Madan Lal Taneja S/o Sh. Radhu Ram, C/o #3065/1, Sector 40D, Chandigarh.Smt. Bimla Taneja W/o Mr. Madan Lal Taneja, C/o #3065/1,...
Case Number: 153
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2015
Omaxe Ltd V/S Sultan Singh
Court Name: South II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Udyog Sadan Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi-16Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/375/20081. Sultan Singh Village Rewal Khanpur P.O Najafgarh New Delhi-43...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji new Delhi-19............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR...
Case Number: 375
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2015
M/S OMAXE LTD. V/S HARBIR SINGH DAHIYA S/O RAM SINGH
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate M.S. RANA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.84 of 2015 Instituted on:12.03.2015 Date of order:03.11.2015Harbir Singh Dahiya son of Shri Ram Singh, r/o 2342, Sector 15, Sonepat. …Complainant. VersusOmaxe Ltd. 7 Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.