company-name-logo

Okhla Industrial Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 57 Consumer Court Cases Against Okhla Industrial Development Authority.

NCDRC

SUSHILA GUPTA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/11/2010 in Appeal No. 451/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Main Administrative Building, Sector - 6...

Case Number: 4554

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2014

NCDRC

PRAKASH CHANDRA CHANDTA SHUKLA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...

Case Number: 118

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2014

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRAKASH CHANDRA SHUKLA

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...

Case Number: 1153

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2014

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SWARNIN VIHAR ASSOCATION OF RESIDENT HIG

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAJU FRANCIS

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 36 OF 20041. SWARNIN VIHAR ASSOCATION OF RESIDENT HIG30-A, HIG, SECTOR-82,NOIDA............Complainant(s)Versus1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER., MAIN ADMINI...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2004

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2014

NCDRC

THE NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SWARNIM VIHAR ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS & 61 ANR.

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRASANTHI PRASAD

Respondant Advocate NA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 18 OF 20051. SWARNIM VIHAR ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS & 61 ANR.Through its President, Section-82, NoidaU.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through The C...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2005

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2013

NCDRC

SUSHILA GUPTA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 454 OF 2013 IN RP/4554/20101. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUSHILA GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN...

Case Number: 454

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 24-09-2013

NCDRC

JITENDER KAUR V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4009 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/03/2012 in Appeal No. 2600/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its CEO, Main Adminstrative Block, Sec...

Case Number: 4009

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2013

NCDRC

KRISHANPAL SINGH V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AMEET SIINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3512 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/05/2010 in Appeal No. 329/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSector-2,NoidaGhaziabadU.P...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3512

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

SUSHILA GUPTA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/11/2010 in Appeal No. 451/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Main Administrative Building, Sector - 6...

Case Number: 4554

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2012

NCDRC

ANIL KUMAR V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4092 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/10/2010 in Appeal No. 53/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMain Administrative Block, Sector 6, NoidaGuatam Budh ...

Case Number: 4092

|

Date of Filing: 09-11-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Okhla Industrial Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Okhla Industrial Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Okhla Industrial Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.