company-name-logo

Nursing Home

Latest Judgments

Total 689 Consumer Court Cases Against Nursing Home.

Chandigarh

Dr. Jagdeep Riar, Consultant Gynaecologist & Obstetrician, Dogra Nursing Home V/S Sh. Jai Raja Garg

Nursing Home  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. for the Revision Petitioners.

Respondant Advocate Sh. Munish Kapila, Adv. for resp. 1, Ms. Alka Sareen, Adv. for resp. 2. Resp. 3 exparte. Sh. Surinder Mohan, Adv. for resp. 4. Sh. Vinod Choudhary, Ad

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019REVISION PETITION NO. 3 of 2012 1. Sh. Jai Raja Garghuaband of Late Mrs. Nitu Garg, aged 35 years resident of House No. 877, Sector 9, Panchkula (...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

GARG NURSING HOME & ORS. V/S KARAMVEER SINGH & ORS.

Nursing Home  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPESH JOSHI

Respondant Advocate DR. MEERA AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 675 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 21/09/2006 in Complaint No. 88/2000 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. KARAMVEER SINGH & ORS.VILLAGE - JATARA, OPPOSITE - THANA DISTRICT - TIKAMGARH MP2. Ravindra Singh ...

Case Number: 675

|

Date of Filing: 30-10-2006

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2012

NCDRC

KARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS. V/S M/S. GARG NURSING HOME AND ANR.

Nursing Home  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. G. UMAPATHY

Respondant Advocate DR. MEERA AGGARWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/10/2007 in Complaint No. 49/2006 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. M/S. GARG NURSING HOME AND ANR.THROUGH PROPRIETOR DR J C GARG MAHAD JI PARK GWALIOR2. Ravinder Singh Ga...

Case Number: 75

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2007

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2012

NCDRC

M/S. D.R. NURSING HOME AND ORS. V/S RAJAT JAIN AND ANR.

Nursing Home  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TARUN K. BEDI

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVI BAKSHI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 199 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 30/10/2006 in Complaint No. C-167/1996 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RAJAT JAIN AND ANR.SHRI RAVI KUMAR JAIN B-18, VIVEK VIHAR PHASE-II, DELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 199

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 25-09-2012

Madhya Pradesh

DOCTOR RAKESH GUPTA SHRI NURSING HOME V/S NARINDRA KUMAR RAJAK

Nursing Home   Doctor  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate SHRI B.G. CHATURVEDI

Respondant Advocate SHRI ARUN GUTAM

Case Number: 207

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2017

Maharashtra

ANAND NURSING HOME V/S MR SHANTILAL MEWADA

Nursing Home  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate VINCENT D'SOUZA

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/12/1591. MR SHANTILAL MEWADA 401 B WING AMAYA APTS SIDDIVINAYAK NAGAR NALLASOPARA WEST THANE 401203THANEMAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ANAND NURSING HOME GODAW...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

MUNGEE NURSING HOME V/S POONAM PRAJAPATI

Nursing Home  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2015

Telangana

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 28-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2016

NCDRC

MANMEET MATTEWAL & ORS V/S DEEP NURSING HOME & ANR

Nursing Home  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS KAWALJIT KOCHAR

Respondant Advocate DR. S.K. GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 31/01/2007 in Complaint No. 56/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DEEP NURSING HOME & ANRTHROUGH DR GURDEEP SINGH KOCHHAR HOUSE NO 3026, SECTOR - 21, CHANDIGARH..........

Case Number: 158

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 10-05-2012

Madhya Pradesh

TRIMURTI NURSING HOME V/S SHIVLAL

Nursing Home  

Court Name: Mandsaur

Appelant Advocate MOD JI

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nursing Home in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nursing Home ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nursing Home under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.