Nokia
Latest Judgments
Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.
Nokia India V/S Bankim Mehta
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Mr.rahul karnik
Respondant Advocate Preeti varma
Complaint Case No. CC/09/3101. Bankim MehtaB-304,jai Chitrakoot co-operative housing society ltd., kulupwadi , boriwali(E)mumbai-66Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia IndiaC/402 buisness square,chakala Andheri((E)Mumbai-93dehli............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABL...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2016
Manager/Proprietor NOKIA CARE, Raichur V/S L.K. Nagangouda @ Nagarajgouda S/o. Sugappa, Raichur
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. Ratnakar
Respondant Advocate Sri. Sateesh V.
Complaint Case No. CC/11/391. L.K. Nagangouda @ Nagarajgouda S/o. Sugappa, RaichurAge: 41 years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/o. Matmari village, Tq. & Dist: RaichurRaichurKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager/Proprietor NOKIA CARE, RaichurS.B. Services, No. 1-10-62, Gopala...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Nokia Priority Three Vee Marketing Pvt. Ltd, V/S Sanjay Bansal,
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 127 of 2011 1. Sanjay Bansal,chd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nokia Priority Three Vee Marketing Pvt. Ltd,chd. ...........Respondent(s)...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Managing Director Nokia India.Pvt.Ltd V/S Sajeev Mathew
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station,KottayamKeralaCC NO. 198 Of 20111. Sajeev MathewKuthivalachathil,Kadaplamattom.P.OKottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Managing Director Nokia India.Pvt.LtdRegistered Office,Radison Complx,Commercial Plaza,MahipalpurNew Delhi......
Case Number: 198
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
NOKIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. V/S JAI PRAKASH MISHRA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1306 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/03/2007 in Appeal No. 497/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. JAI PRAKASH MISHRA S/O. LATE OF SURMD MISRA RESIDENT OF 146/6. SHSTI NAGAR UJJAIN .......
Case Number: 1306
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2011
The Care Manager Nokia India Ltd. V/S T.R.Santhosh
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumCivil Station,KottayamKeralaCC NO. 159 Of 20111. T.R.SanthoshVellappallil House,Pala.P.oKottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Care Manager Nokia India Ltd.S.P.Intocity Industrial Plot,# 243,Phase.1,Gurgaon Hariyana2. P.N.R Mobile StorePuli...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Nokia Priority Three Vee Marketing Pvt. Ltd, V/S Sanjay Bansal,
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 347 of 2011 1. Sanjay Bansal,R/o # 800, Phase II, Ram Darbar, UT, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nokia Priority Three Vee Marketing Pvt. L...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manager, Nokia India Private Ltd. V/S Mahendra Urf Mahesh S/o Balaaram jat
Court Name: Dhar
Appelant Advocate Mr. Ajay Choudhary
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.