company-name-logo

Nokia

Latest Judgments

Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.

Madhya Pradesh

NOKIA INDIA V/S R.P.S.SENGAR

Nokia  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 75

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2016

Kerala

The Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd, SP Infocity, Industrial Plot 243, Udyog Vihar, Phase-1, Gurgaon-1 V/S Shihabudeen.A, Kanjankuzhiyilveedu,Umayanalloor P.O, Kollam.

Nokia  

Court Name: Kollam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/42/20131. Shihabudeen.A, Kanjankuzhiyilveedu,Umayanalloor P.O, Kollam.............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd, SP Infocity, Industrial Plot 243, Udyog Vihar, Phase-1, Gurgaon-122016.2. The Proprietor, Cell World, Muthoot Chambers...

Case Number: 42

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Nokia India Pra.Ltd V/S Rahul Gulati

Nokia  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-02-2016

Kerala

Manager, Nokia Business CommunicationCentre, Chiramel Chambers, Karunagappally Road, Cochin-682015 V/S Thushas M.S., Thushara, Veliyam . .O, Kollam

Nokia  

Court Name: Kollam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/197/20121. Thushas M.S., Thushara, Veliyam . .O, Kollam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, Nokia Business CommunicationCentre, Chiramel Chambers, Karunagappally Road, Cochin-6820152. Manager, QRS Retails limited, Residency Road , Kollam-691001.3. Mana...

Case Number: 197

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Nokia India V/S Veerendar Singh

Nokia  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Chandigarh

Nokia Care V/S Aman Sharma

Nokia  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 823 of 2012 1. Aman SharmaS/o Sh. Swarn Kumar , R/o # 937, Ucha Khera, Ropar (Pb.), and Permanent R/o # 940, Ucha Khera, Ropar (Pb.) ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nokia CareSCO 2433-34, 2nd Floor, Sector 22-C, chandigarh...

Case Number: 823

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

1. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its authorized person, Mahipalpur, New Delhi-110 037. V/S Vanagala Venkataswara Sastry, S/o. Subrahmanya Sastry, Hindu, Aged about 60 Years, R/o. 23-22-31, NRP Road, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada-11.

Nokia  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Ch. Raghu Ram

Respondant Advocate

FA No: 954 Of 2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/10/2012 in Case No. CC/77/2012 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)1. Vanagala Venkataswara Sastry, S/o. Subrahmanya Sastry, Hindu, Aged about 60 Years, R/o. 23-22-31, NRP Road, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada-11............Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 954

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Manager Nokia India P.L. V/S Virendrasingh rajput

Nokia  

Court Name: Dhar

Appelant Advocate Chandrawat

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 160

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 01-09-2016

Madhya Pradesh

NOKIA CARE CENTER V/S ROTESH KOSTA

Nokia  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Chandigarh

Nokia Mobile Co. V/S Puneet

Nokia   Mobile  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 773 of 2012 1. Puneet S/o Late Sh. Mahant Tripathi, R/o # 49, Sector 23-A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Nokia Mobile Co.(Nokia Care Centre), SCO 2433-34, Sector 22, Chandigarh2. Anmol Watches SCO 1043, Sector...

Case Number: 773

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.