company-name-logo

Nokia

Latest Judgments

Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.

Madhya Pradesh

NOKIA CARE V/S SANJAY SHARMA

Nokia  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Manager Nokia India P.L. V/S Ajit Huriya

Nokia  

Court Name: Dhar

Appelant Advocate Shekh Kamaluddin

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 207

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2016

Andhra Pradesh

1. Authorized Signatory, Nokia Care, Authorized Service Center, A.S.C Code.462.465550 V/S Naziya Ahmed Khan, Mohinuddin Hasim Khan

Nokia  

Court Name: Cuddapah

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate Sri G.Trivikram Singh

Heading 1Heading 2Complaint Case No. CC/25/20131. Naziya Ahmed Khan, Mohinuddin Hasim KhanD.No.7/81, Chilakadabavi,Kadapa,YSR DistrictKadapa, YSR DistrictAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Authorized Signatory, Nokia Care, Authorized Service Center, A.S.C Code.462...

Case Number: 25

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

NOKIA AUTHORISED SERVICE V/S N SURESH

Nokia  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/13/461. N SURESHKALPAKA GARDENS PAPPANAMKODE TVPM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NOKIA AUTHORISED SERVICEBRIGHT MOBILE CARE VIJAYA TOWER KARAMANA TVM2. QRSKARAMANA TVPM........

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 01-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S PANKAJ MEHTA

Nokia  

Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CC NO. 78 Of 20121. PANKAJ MEHTA194, JAWAHARNAGAR,SHANTINIKETAN 2 ND FLOOR, ROAD.NO.3 GOREGAON (W) MUMBAI.MUMBAIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD.KAILASH BUILDING, FLAT. 1204, 12 TH FLOOT, KASTURBA G. MARG. NEW DELHINEW DELHI.DELHI2. NOKIA INDIA PV...

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

NOKIA INDIA PVT. LTD. V/S NAKUL SINGH

Nokia  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 523

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

West Bengal

Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. V/S SHIV SHANKAR BHARTI

Nokia  

Court Name: Howrah

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892Complaint Case No. CC/13/3431. SHIV SHANKAR BHARTI178/52, Railway Quarter, Golmohar Avenue, Howrah - 711 101..............

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

NOKIA INDIA SELLS PRY. LTD. V/S AMANA KISHOR

Nokia  

Court Name: Bhind

Appelant Advocate SHRI DHRUV SINGH BHADORIA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 270

|

Date of Filing: 01-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2016

Kerala

Manager Nokia City V/S Raveendranadhan.K.P

Nokia  

Court Name: Kottayam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/322/20111. Raveendranadhan.K.PKandathil House,Ramapuram Bazar.P.O,Kottayam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager Nokia CityManarkadu Jn.Pala Road,Thodupuzha............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Sri. Bose Augustine PRE...

Case Number: 322

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Riyaj Ahmad Khan

Nokia  

Court Name: Jalgaon

Appelant Advocate Adv. Khan

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/10/221. Riyaj Ahmad KhanMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.Maharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. M.S.Sonawane PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. C.M. Yeshirao Member PRESENT:Adv. Khan, Advocate for the Complainant 1 ORDER�...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.