company-name-logo

Nokia

Latest Judgments

Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.

Orissa

Chandan Comunication, Nokia Care V/S Srikant Panigrahy

Nokia  

Court Name: Ganjam

Appelant Advocate Sri K.C Sahu

Respondant Advocate B.K Padhy

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURComplaint Case No. CC/31/20141. Srikant PanigrahyS/o. Late Eswar Panigrahy, Business by Professon, Resident of Niladri Bihar 1st Lane, P.O: Brahmapur, P.S:B Town, Brahmapur.GanjamOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 31

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Orissa

Chandan Comunication, Nokia Care V/S R.Murli Mohan

Nokia  

Court Name: Ganjam

Appelant Advocate Sri K.C Sahu

Respondant Advocate Sri B.K Padhy

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURComplaint Case No. CC/32/20141. R.Murli MohanS/o. Late R. Appala Raju, Businees by profession, Resident of Tulasi Nagar 3rd Lane, P.O.: Brahmapur, P.S.: B. Town, Brahmapur.GanjamOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. C...

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Nokia India pvt.ltd. V/S Virendra Singh

Nokia  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2016

Maharashtra

Nokia India Pvt Ltd. sp Infocity V/S Shri Romit s/o Rajendra R. Jaiswal

Nokia  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Hitesh N. Verma

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/13/4231. Shri Romit s/o Rajendra R. JaiswalAged about 27 years r/o 188@0 Gaddigodam Chowk Above Kashmimr Beer, Kamptee Road, Nagpur...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 29-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

nokia V/S jinu jorge

Nokia  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2020

Maharashtra

Nokia Care V/S Dyaneshwar Govind Nemon

Nokia  

Court Name: Central Mumbai

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012 Complaint Case No. CC/13/331. Dyaneshwar Govind NemonGitabai Chawl, Room No. 1 Nirmal Nagar, Bldg. No.7 Khar (E)Mumbai-40...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Ex.Officer Nokia India Pvt Ltd V/S Saiyad Latif Saiyad Rahmat

Nokia  

Court Name: Jalgaon

Appelant Advocate self

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/3341. Saiyad Latif Saiyad RahmatJalgaonJalgaonMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Ex.Officer Nokia India Pvt LtdNew Dheli JalgaonMaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Vishwas D. Dhawale PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. Poonam N.Malik MEMB...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

The Care Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon V/S Chitturi Srinivas, S/o. V.V. Satyanarayana, Bhadrachalam

Nokia  

Court Name: Khammam

Appelant Advocate Billa Srinivasa Rao

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2019

Maharashtra

Nokia Co. V/S sadashiv Shankar Powar

Nokia  

Court Name: Kolhapur

Appelant Advocate P.S.Bhawke./T.A.Nadaf

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOLHAPURCentral Administrative Building, South Side, Second Floor, Kasaba Bawada Road, Kolhapur.Phone No. 0231-2651327, Fax No. 0231-2651127Email- confo-ko-mh@nic.in, Website- www.confonet.nic.in Complaint Case No. CC/12/2811. sadashiv ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 28-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Orissa

Nokia India Pvt.Ltd V/S Niranjan Panda

Nokia  

Court Name: Ganjam

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate Sri B.K.Padhy

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURComplaint Case No. CC/102/20131. Niranjan PandaPandaS/o.Sri Somanath Panda, Baikuntha Nagar 5th Lane,Gate Bazar,Brahmapur,Ganjam............Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia India Pvt.LtdSP Infocity,Industrial Plot-243, Udyo...

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 01-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.