company-name-logo

Nokia

Latest Judgments

Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.

Maharashtra

. Nokia Care Manager, Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd., V/S Manoj Bhaskar Garbade,

Nokia  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-07-2015

Delhi

M/S. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. V/S K.D. Kabra

Nokia  

Court Name: New Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/475/11 Dated: In the matter of:K.D Kabra,B-703/2, Ganesh Nagar-II,Shakapur, Delhi-110092……..COMPLAINANTVERSUSNokia India ...

Case Number: 475

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2015

Bihar

Computer Gallery, Nokia Care V/S Hasan

Nokia   Computer  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv. Sujeet Kumar Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 28-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 10-10-2017

Meghalaya

Nokia India Sales Pvt Ltd V/S Pynshailang Khongtiang

Nokia  

Court Name: East Khasi Hills

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. CC/16/2015( Date of Filing : 29 May 2015 )1. Pynshailang Khongtiang Pynursla ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia India Sales Pvt Ltd3P Infosity Plot 243 Udyog Vihar Phase Dund...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-09-2022

Circuit Bench Nagpur

SUDHIR MAHADEORAO MUNDANE V/S NOKIA CARE CENTRE

Nokia  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ADV TEJAS PATIL,aDV KUNAL NALAMWAR

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. FA/14/123( Date of Filing : 07 Apr 2014 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/04/2014 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/13/13 of District Yavatmal)1. NOKIA CARE CENTREMAA DURGA DAWA BAZAR,...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 07-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2020

Punjab

Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. V/S Tarsem Chand Jindal

Nokia   Jindal  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mandeep Kumar Dhot

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2015

Kerala

MANAGER, M/S NOKIA CARE V/S ELDHO PETER MATHEW

Nokia  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/14/7871. ELDHO PETER MATHEWCHELATTU HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 691............Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER, M/S NOKIA CAREPOOVATH INTERNATIONAL, OPP. SARITHA THEATRE, CC 41/4108, 4TH FLOOR, KURIAN TOWERS...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 20-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Kerala

M/S NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR V/S DERIN RODRIGUES

Nokia  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate PHILIP T VARGHESE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/14/6461. DERIN RODRIGUESKOLLAMVELIYAKATH HOUSE,MANJANAKKAD,NJARAKKAL P.O. ERNAKULAM-682 505...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S NOKIA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR(CORPORATE OFFICE) T...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2015

Orissa

1 M/S Swastik Electronics , 2- The Care Manager , Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. , 3- The Manager , No V/S Pradipta Ku Nayak , S/O Prahallad Ch Nayak

Nokia  

Court Name: Bhadrak

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/58/20151. Pradipta Ku Nayak , S/O Prahallad Ch NayakAt- Kantapal , Po- Charampa , Dist- Bhadrak ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1 M/S Swastik Electronics , 2- The Care Manager , Nokia India Sales Pvt. Ltd. , 3- The Manager , Nokia Care Cent...

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2015

Madhya Pradesh

MANAGER NOKIA CARE SERVICE CENTER SATNA & OTHERS V/S MANOJ SINGH

Nokia  

Court Name: Satna

Appelant Advocate VINOD GAUTAM

Respondant Advocate NA

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-06-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.