company-name-logo

Nokia

Latest Judgments

Total 1212 Consumer Court Cases Against Nokia.

Madhya Pradesh

nokia india V/S pushpak jain

Nokia  

Court Name: Ujjain

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 2011

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 05-06-2017

Orissa

NOKIA India Pvt. Ltd V/S Sri Niranjan Panda

Nokia  

Court Name: Ganjam

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate Mr. K.Ch. Bosoyi, Mr. S.K.Bishoyi, Advocates.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM, BERHAMPURExecution Application No. EA/45/2014InComplaint Case No. CC/102/20131. Sri Niranjan PandaS/o. Sri Somanath Panda, Baikunta Nagar 5th lane, Gate Bazar, Berhampur...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NOKIA India Pvt. LtdSP Info...

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 26-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2017

Assam

The Care Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. S.P. Infocity V/S Manik Chand Bhura

Nokia  

Court Name: Cachar

Appelant Advocate Soumen Choudhury

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. Exe/1/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/9/20121. Manik Chand Bhura Shillongpatty, Silchar Town, P/O- Silchar, Dist. Cachar............Appellant(s)Versus1. The Care Manager, Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. S.P. InfocityS.P. Infocity, Industrial Plot H243 ...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2017

Haryana

Nokia India Sales Pvt.Ltd. V/S Deep Chand Singla S/o Banarashi Dass

Nokia  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Complainant Inperson

Respondant Advocate

D.C.Singla vs. Nokia IndiaEx. No. 22 of 2017.Present: Sh. D.C.Singla, DH in person. Sh. Naresh Bhalla, Proprietor JD No.3 in person. JD No.3 Sh. Naresh Bhalla made a statement that he has handed over a new Microsoft 535 mobile phone to the DH with same term and condition provide...

Case Number: 22

|

Date of Filing: 27-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2017

Himachal Pradesh

Nokia Service Center V/S Sanjeev

Nokia  

Court Name: Shimla

Appelant Advocate R.S.Chandel

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 20-05-2017

Kerala

The Proprietor, Positive Nokia Care V/S K.Sukumaran Nair

Nokia  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/15/48InComplaint Case No. CC/12/171. K.Sukumaran NairSukumara Vilasam, Manchavilakam, NTA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor, Positive Nokia CareOpp CSI Chur...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2017

Haryana

Nokia Care V/S Rajender Kumar

Nokia  

Court Name: Sirsa

Appelant Advocate Complainant

Respondant Advocate Ravinder Monga,JS Sidhu

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/16/2081. Rajender KumarVillage Kherwala dist SirsaSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nokia CareNear old Civil Hospital SirsaSirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Rajni Goyat PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. Mohinder P...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 11-05-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Nokia Mobile Repairing Centre & Others V/S Mohd. Qarrar

Nokia   Mobile  

Court Name: Barabanki

Appelant Advocate Niyamat Ullah & Vivek Srivastav

Respondant Advocate

Before, The District Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionCollectorate CompoundBarabankiUttar PradeshComplaint Case No. CC/73/2016( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2016 )1. Mohd. QarrarVillage-Palhari, Safdarganj, Pargana-Pratapganj, Tehsil-Nawabganj, BarbankiBarabankiUttar Pradesh........

Case Number: 73

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-09-2022

Gujarat

NOKIA SIMONS NETWORK,ORBIT ENOVATIVE SER.,THE PHONE HOUSE V/S VISHWESH C TRIVEDI

Nokia  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate D C MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2017

Uttar Pradesh

NOKIA V/S MOHD. TARIQ HASAN

Nokia  

Court Name: Lucknow-II

Appelant Advocate SUDHIR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 18-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-05-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nokia in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nokia ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nokia under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.