company-name-logo

Nestle

Latest Judgments

Total 23 Consumer Court Cases Against Nestle.

Maharashtra

M/S. HARISIDDH CORPORATION AND ORS. V/S NESTLE CO-OP.HSG.SOC.LTD.

Nestle  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/01/4851. NESTLE CO-OP.HSG.SOC.LTD.PLOT NO.78, LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI(W), MUMBAI-58............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. HARISIDDH CORPORATION AND ORS.1, BAPUJI NIVAS,...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2001

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2015

Meghalaya

Smt C Jana V/S M/s Nestle India

Nestle  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr S Jindal

Respondant Advocate Mr P Yowin

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2021

Meghalaya

Nestle India Ltd V/S Smti C.Jana

Nestle  

Court Name: East Khasi Hills

Appelant Advocate Shri P.Yobin

Respondant Advocate Shri S.Jindal

Case Number: 49

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2022

NCDRC

NESTLE INDIA LTD. V/S CONSUMER EDUCATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY

Education   Nestle   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. PAREKH & CO.

Respondant Advocate M/S. GLOBAL LEGAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 101 OF 20031. CONSUMER EDUCATION & RESEARCH SOCIETYSURAKSHA SANKOOLAHMEDABAD GANDHINAGAR HIGHWAYTHALTEJ AHMEDABAD - 380 054...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NESTLE INDIA LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTORHE...

Case Number: 101

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2003

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2013

Karnataka

NESTLE INDIA V/S ARATI TIWARI

Nestle  

Court Name: Gulbarga

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 99

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2022

NCDRC

B. MURLI, Senior Vice President, Nestle India Ltd. V/S SHASHI GUPTA

Nestle  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR.RAJAN NARAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1648 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/02/2012 in Appeal No. 304/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHASHI GUPTA231/20 Onkar nagar-8 tri NagarDelhi - 110035Delhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. B. ...

Case Number: 1648

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2013

Circuit Bench Nagpur

SHAIKH MUJIB HAMID V/S MAGGI TOMATO KETCHUP, NESTLE INDIA LIMITED,

Nestle  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/S.C.M.& ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/01/1173(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/07/2001 in Case No. CC/97/385 of District None)1. MAGGI TOMATO KETCHUP, NEST...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2001

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Nestle India Ltd V/S K.Gopakumar,Advocate

Nestle  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate Pramod.K

Respondant Advocate

In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannurExecution Application No. EP/64/2004 1. K.Gopakumar,Advocate Anjali,Cheruvathur.P.O. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Nestle India Ltd M/5A Connaugh Circle,New Delhi 110001 2. Zam Zam MedicalsPayyanurKannurKerala3. Kamalash Enterpris...

Case Number: 64

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2004

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

NESTLE INDIA LIMITED V/S T.T.CHACKO

Nestle  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate P.G.ANOOP NARAYANAN

Respondant Advocate JAYAPRASAD

KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CIVIL STATIONconsumer case(CC) No. 234/2003 T.T.CHACKO ...........Appellant(s)Vs.MALABAR SUPER MARKETNESTLE INDIA LIMITED ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): OppositeParty/Respondent(s): OppositeParty/Respo...

Case Number: 234

|

Date of Filing: 09-06-2003

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

1. M/S. Nestle India Ltd. V/S Biswajit Baidya, S/O Late N.C. Shekhar Baidya. C/O Pranab kr. Deb.

Nestle  

Court Name: South 24 Parganas

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 130

|

Date of Filing: 07-04-2003

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nestle in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nestle ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nestle under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.